SCSPX vs. SCCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX) and Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX).
SCSPX is managed by Sterling Capital. It was launched on Jun 30, 2011. SCCPX is managed by Sterling Capital. It was launched on Jun 30, 2011.
Performance
SCSPX vs. SCCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCSPX vs. SCCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCSPX Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund | -0.34% | 7.61% | 2.38% | 4.51% | -9.02% | -1.05% | 4.58% | 6.24% | 1.49% | 3.09% |
SCCPX Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund | -2.12% | 6.37% | -1.68% | 9.20% | -23.65% | -0.01% | 625.95% | 10.78% | -0.95% | 4.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCSPX achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly higher than SCCPX's -2.12% return. Over the past 10 years, SCSPX has underperformed SCCPX with an annualized return of 1.93%, while SCCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.91% annualized return.
SCSPX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- 1.93%
SCCPX
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- 1Y
- 1.94%
- 3Y*
- 2.06%
- 5Y*
- -2.77%
- 10Y*
- 21.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCSPX vs. SCCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCSPX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SCCPX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SCSPX vs. SCCPX — Risk / Return Rank
SCSPX
SCCPX
SCSPX vs. SCCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX) and Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCSPX | SCCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 0.34 | +0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | 0.51 | +1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.06 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 0.68 | +1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.98 | 1.62 | +4.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCSPX | SCCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 0.34 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | -0.25 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.12 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.11 | +0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCSPX and SCCPX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SCSPX vs. SCCPX - Dividend Comparison
SCSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than SCCPX's 4.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCSPX Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund | 3.55% | 3.85% | 3.60% | 2.57% | 2.37% | 2.05% | 2.50% | 2.99% | 3.19% | 2.74% | 2.66% | 2.71% |
SCCPX Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund | 4.71% | 4.99% | 4.84% | 3.54% | 4.11% | 13.93% | 88.30% | 3.01% | 3.31% | 3.76% | 3.41% | 3.16% |
Drawdowns
SCSPX vs. SCCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCSPX drawdown since its inception was -13.41%, smaller than the maximum SCCPX drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSPX and SCCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCSPX | SCCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.41% | -31.88% | +18.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -5.49% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.41% | -31.88% | +18.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.41% | -31.88% | +18.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -15.66% | +13.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.17% | -6.30% | +4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 2.31% | -1.42% |
Volatility
SCSPX vs. SCCPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX) is 1.48%, while Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that SCSPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCSPX | SCCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 3.26% | -1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.43% | 5.20% | -2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04% | 8.85% | -4.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.91% | 11.11% | -6.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.92% | 182.21% | -178.29% |