PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCSPX vs. SCCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCSPX vs. SCCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX) and Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCSPX achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than SCCPX's 0.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SCSPX has underperformed SCCPX with an annualized return of 1.91%, while SCCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.10% annualized return.


SCSPX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.52%
1Y
5.59%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
0.86%
10Y*
1.91%

SCCPX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.34%
YTD
0.97%
6M
0.38%
1Y
7.88%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
-2.47%
10Y*
22.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCSPX vs. SCCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCSPX
Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund
0.42%7.61%2.38%4.51%-9.02%-1.05%4.58%6.24%1.49%3.09%
SCCPX
Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund
0.97%6.37%-1.68%9.20%-23.65%-0.01%625.95%10.78%-0.95%4.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SCSPX and SCCPX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.81

The correlation between SCSPX and SCCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCSPX vs. SCCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCSPX
SCSPX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SCSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SCSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

SCCPX
SCCPX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SCCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SCCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCSPX vs. SCCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX) and Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCSPXSCCPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

0.94

+0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

1.38

+0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.16

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

1.43

+0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.23

3.66

+2.57

SCSPX vs. SCCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCSPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the SCCPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCSPX and SCCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCSPXSCCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

0.94

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

-0.22

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.12

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.11

+0.51

Drawdowns

SCSPX vs. SCCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCSPX drawdown since its inception was -13.41%, smaller than the maximum SCCPX drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSPX and SCCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCSPXSCCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.41%

-31.88%

+18.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-5.49%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.08%

-12.96%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.41%

-31.88%

+18.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.41%

-31.88%

+18.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-13.00%

+11.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-6.39%

+4.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

2.15%

-1.22%

Volatility

SCSPX vs. SCCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX) is 1.32%, while Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX) has a volatility of 2.58%. This indicates that SCSPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCSPXSCCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

2.58%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

5.56%

-2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64%

7.76%

-4.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.96%

11.19%

-6.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.94%

182.25%

-178.31%

SCSPX vs. SCCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCSPX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SCCPX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCSPX vs. SCCPX - Dividend Comparison

SCSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than SCCPX's 5.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCCPX
Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund
5.09%4.99%4.84%3.54%4.11%13.93%88.30%3.01%3.31%3.76%3.41%3.16%
SCSPX
Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund
3.91%3.85%3.60%2.57%2.37%2.05%2.50%2.99%3.19%2.74%2.66%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCSPX and SCCPX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCCPX has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to SCSPX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCSPX dropped -13.41% vs SCCPX's -31.88%.

SCSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCSPX and SCCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer