PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCSB vs. TFFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCSB vs. TFFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF (SCSB) and Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF (TFFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SCSB

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TFFI

1D
0.21%
1M
1.17%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCSB vs. TFFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCSB and TFFI is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026

-0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCSB vs. TFFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF (SCSB) and Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF (TFFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCSB vs. TFFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCSB vs. TFFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCSB drawdown since its inception was -0.46%, smaller than the maximum TFFI drawdown of -4.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSB and TFFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCSBTFFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.46%

-4.23%

+3.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.83%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-1.66%

+1.57%

Volatility

SCSB vs. TFFI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCSBTFFIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47%

7.92%

-6.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.47%

7.92%

-6.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.47%

7.92%

-6.45%

SCSB vs. TFFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCSB has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than TFFI's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCSB vs. TFFI - Dividend Comparison

SCSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, while TFFI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCSB and TFFI have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCSB is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCSB is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TFFI.

SCSB has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.00% for TFFI.

They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and Chesapeake. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for SCSB and 1.01% for TFFI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCSB and TFFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer