SCSB vs. TEMR
SCSB (Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF) and TEMR (T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCSB charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TEMR.
Performance
SCSB vs. TEMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCSB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEMR
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- -6.98%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCSB vs. TEMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCSB Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF | 1.22% |
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF | 16.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCSB and TEMR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCSB vs. TEMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF (SCSB) and T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF (TEMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCSB vs. TEMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCSB drawdown since its inception was -0.46%, smaller than the maximum TEMR drawdown of -10.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSB and TEMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCSB | TEMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.46% | -10.07% | +9.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.07% | +10.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -2.93% | +2.84% |
Volatility
SCSB vs. TEMR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCSB | TEMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47% | 33.55% | -32.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.47% | 33.55% | -32.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.47% | 33.55% | -32.08% |
SCSB vs. TEMR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCSB has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than TEMR's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCSB vs. TEMR - Dividend Comparison
SCSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, while TEMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
SCSB Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF | 1.62% |
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCSB and TEMR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCSB is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCSB is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TEMR.
SCSB has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.00% for TEMR.
They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for SCSB and 0.40% for TEMR.
Find the right allocation for SCSB and TEMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer