SCSB vs. SAPH

Last updated Jul 31, 2026

SCSB (Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF) and SAPH (ADRhedged SAP ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SCSB charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SAPH.

Performance

SCSB vs. SAPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF (SCSB) and ADRhedged SAP ETF (SAPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SCSB

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.04%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

SAPH

• 1D: -3.22%
• 1M: 15.89%
• 6M: -3.53%
• YTD: -21.87%
• 1Y: -35.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -22.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SAPH ADRhedged SAP ETF	$30.78K	$28.87K	$22.76K
SCSB Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF	$168.03K	$122.36K	$90.19K

SCSB vs. SAPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SCSB Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF	1.06%
SAPH ADRhedged SAP ETF	12.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SCSB and SAPH is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026	0.19

Return for Risk

SCSB vs. SAPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCSB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SAPH

SAPH Risk / Return Rank: 2
SAPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SAPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SAPH Omega Ratio Rank: 2
SAPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
SAPH Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCSB vs. SAPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF (SCSB) and ADRhedged SAP ETF (SAPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCSB	SAPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.96	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.33	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.83	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.77	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.24	—

Drawdowns

SCSB vs. SAPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCSB drawdown since its inception was -0.52%, smaller than the maximum SAPH drawdown of -51.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSB and SAPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCSB	SAPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.52%	-51.72%	+51.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-47.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-41.42%	+41.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.10%	-23.15%	+23.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	29.13%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SCSB	SAPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	15.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	33.78%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.60%	37.42%	-35.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.60%	35.53%	-33.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.60%	35.53%	-33.93%

SCSB vs. SAPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCSB has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SAPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCSB vs. SAPH - Dividend Comparison

SCSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than SAPH's 3.57% yield.

Position	TTM
SAPH ADRhedged SAP ETF	3.57%
SCSB Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCSB and SAPH in my portfolio?

SCSB and SAPH have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SCSB or SAPH?

On fees, SAPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCSB or SAPH?

SAPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for SCSB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCSB or SAPH?

SAPH has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 1.62% for SCSB.

What is the main difference between SCSB and SAPH?

They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for SCSB and 0.19% for SAPH.