SCRZX vs. QUASX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Small Cap Core Portfolio (SCRZX) and AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX).
SCRZX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Dec 29, 2015. QUASX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Feb 12, 1969.
Performance
SCRZX vs. QUASX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCRZX vs. QUASX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCRZX AB Small Cap Core Portfolio | -2.23% | 7.75% | 7.72% | 20.91% | -18.89% | 23.27% | 12.41% | 24.28% | -13.25% | 7.40% |
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio | -7.77% | 4.85% | 18.49% | 17.83% | -39.09% | 9.76% | 53.85% | 49.85% | -1.02% | 34.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCRZX achieves a -2.23% return, which is significantly higher than QUASX's -7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SCRZX has underperformed QUASX with an annualized return of 8.10%, while QUASX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.29% annualized return.
SCRZX
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -2.23%
- 6M
- -1.32%
- 1Y
- 16.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 3.88%
- 10Y*
- 8.10%
QUASX
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- -9.96%
- YTD
- -7.77%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- 12.87%
- 3Y*
- 7.13%
- 5Y*
- -2.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCRZX vs. QUASX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCRZX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than QUASX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SCRZX vs. QUASX — Risk / Return Rank
SCRZX
QUASX
SCRZX vs. QUASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Small Cap Core Portfolio (SCRZX) and AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCRZX | QUASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 0.42 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.15 | 0.77 | +0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.10 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 0.59 | +0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | 2.04 | +1.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCRZX | QUASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 0.42 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | -0.10 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.49 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.36 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCRZX and QUASX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SCRZX vs. QUASX - Dividend Comparison
SCRZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.98%, while QUASX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCRZX AB Small Cap Core Portfolio | 10.98% | 10.74% | 15.00% | 8.51% | 8.47% | 5.95% | 0.51% | 0.47% | 8.63% | 6.37% | 0.28% | 0.00% |
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.07% | 9.86% | 18.20% | 19.70% | 9.29% | 2.32% | 9.19% |
Drawdowns
SCRZX vs. QUASX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCRZX drawdown since its inception was -44.82%, smaller than the maximum QUASX drawdown of -60.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCRZX and QUASX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCRZX | QUASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.82% | -60.97% | +16.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.92% | -15.10% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -47.37% | +18.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.82% | -47.37% | +2.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.37% | -25.06% | +15.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.78% | -15.78% | +7.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 4.37% | -0.92% |
Volatility
SCRZX vs. QUASX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Small Cap Core Portfolio (SCRZX) is 6.23%, while AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) has a volatility of 9.91%. This indicates that SCRZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCRZX | QUASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 9.91% | -3.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 18.36% | -5.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.74% | 27.66% | -4.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 26.19% | -4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.17% | 25.39% | -2.22% |