SCRD vs. AMDL
SCRD (Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF) and AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCRD is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while AMDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SCRD returned 6.25% vs 1189.78% for AMDL. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCRD charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for AMDL.
Performance
SCRD vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCRD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 395.18% return.
SCRD
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 0.13%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDL
- 1D
- 8.25%
- 1M
- 135.69%
- YTD
- 395.18%
- 6M
- 371.52%
- 1Y
- 1,189.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCRD vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SCRD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF | 0.24% | 7.77% | 4.42% |
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | 395.18% | 103.00% | -69.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCRD and AMDL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024 | 0.15 |
SCRD vs. AMDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCRD
AMDL
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SCRD
AMDL
-
Healthcare
SCRD
AMDL
-
Industrials
SCRD
AMDL
-
Consumer Defensive
SCRD
AMDL
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCRD
AMDL
-
Real Estate
SCRD
AMDL
-
Technology
SCRD
AMDL
Communication Services
SCRD
AMDL
-
Energy
SCRD
AMDL
-
Basic Materials
SCRD
AMDL
-
Utilities
SCRD
AMDL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCRD vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank
SCRD
AMDL
SCRD vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (SCRD) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCRD | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.63 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 21.43 | -19.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.63 | 42.08 | -34.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCRD | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 9.30 | -7.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.56 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
SCRD vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCRD drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCRD and AMDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCRD | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.17% | -88.63% | +67.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -56.13% | +53.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | 0.00% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.77% | -48.58% | +39.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | 28.53% | -27.71% |
Volatility
SCRD vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (SCRD) is 1.25%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 46.02%. This indicates that SCRD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCRD | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 46.02% | -44.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.78% | 94.09% | -91.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.88% | 129.41% | -125.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.32% | 116.59% | -110.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.32% | 116.59% | -110.27% |
SCRD vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCRD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCRD vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison
SCRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCRD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF | 5.44% | 5.28% | 5.36% | 3.99% | 2.77% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCRD and AMDL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMDL has higher volatility (46.02%) compared to SCRD (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCRD dropped -21.17% vs AMDL's -88.63%.
On 1-year performance, AMDL leads with 1189.78% vs 6.25% for SCRD. On fees, SCRD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SCRD has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMDL has performed better with a 1189.78% return vs 6.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCRD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.
SCRD has the higher dividend yield at 5.44%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.
SCRD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while AMDL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SCRD and 1.15% for AMDL.
AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.30 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCRD and AMDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer