PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCPZX vs. UMBMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCPZX vs. UMBMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund (SCPZX) and Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCPZX achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than UMBMX's 13.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SCPZX has underperformed UMBMX with an annualized return of 2.88%, while UMBMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.87% annualized return.


SCPZX

1D
0.03%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.85%
6M
0.55%
1Y
6.45%
3Y*
4.52%
5Y*
0.92%
10Y*
2.88%

UMBMX

1D
1.25%
1M
2.03%
YTD
13.58%
6M
13.25%
1Y
26.23%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCPZX vs. UMBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCPZX
Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund
0.85%8.68%1.34%6.27%-11.79%-1.96%16.56%8.30%0.76%3.51%
UMBMX
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund
13.58%15.46%22.93%12.73%-17.31%15.69%27.28%20.76%-9.83%24.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SCPZX and UMBMX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2006

-0.02

The correlation between SCPZX and UMBMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCPZX vs. UMBMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCPZX
SCPZX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SCPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SCPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

UMBMX
UMBMX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UMBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
UMBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCPZX vs. UMBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund (SCPZX) and Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCPZXUMBMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

2.98

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.49

11.78

-4.28

SCPZX vs. UMBMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCPZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the UMBMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCPZX and UMBMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCPZXUMBMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.90

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.52

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.68

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.58

-0.24

Drawdowns

SCPZX vs. UMBMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCPZX drawdown since its inception was -28.85%, smaller than the maximum UMBMX drawdown of -49.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCPZX and UMBMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCPZXUMBMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.85%

-49.91%

+21.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-9.19%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.72%

-19.41%

+11.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.39%

-26.30%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.38%

-36.91%

+18.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-0.25%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

-7.11%

+3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

2.32%

-1.45%

Volatility

SCPZX vs. UMBMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund (SCPZX) is 1.57%, while Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that SCPZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCPZXUMBMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.57%

4.31%

-2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

11.28%

-8.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11%

14.37%

-10.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.56%

17.73%

-11.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.60%

19.11%

-13.51%

SCPZX vs. UMBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCPZX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than UMBMX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCPZX vs. UMBMX - Dividend Comparison

SCPZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than UMBMX's 9.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCPZX
Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund
4.24%4.35%4.70%4.31%3.06%1.27%5.79%4.47%2.26%1.76%3.92%2.89%
UMBMX
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund
9.06%10.29%15.75%0.17%4.21%11.54%2.40%0.74%8.09%8.38%2.39%8.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCPZX and UMBMX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UMBMX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to SCPZX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCPZX dropped -28.85% vs UMBMX's -49.91%.

UMBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCPZX and UMBMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer