SCPZX vs. HRSCX
SCPZX (Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund) and HRSCX (Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - SCPZX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Carillon Family of Funds, while HRSCX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Carillon Family of Funds. Over the past 10 years, SCPZX returned 2.87%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for HRSCX. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. SCPZX charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for HRSCX.
Performance
SCPZX vs. HRSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCPZX achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than HRSCX's 22.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SCPZX has underperformed HRSCX with an annualized return of 2.87%, while HRSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.82% annualized return.
SCPZX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 5.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.87%
- 10Y*
- 2.87%
HRSCX
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- YTD
- 22.65%
- 6M
- 19.07%
- 1Y
- 40.86%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
SCPZX vs. HRSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCPZX Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund | 1.08% | 8.68% | 1.34% | 6.27% | -11.79% | -1.96% | 16.56% | 8.30% | 0.76% | 3.51% |
HRSCX Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund | 22.65% | 11.26% | 12.85% | 14.06% | -27.67% | 0.80% | 37.26% | 25.40% | -10.92% | 22.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCPZX and HRSCX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997 | -0.04 |
The correlation between SCPZX and HRSCX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCPZX vs. HRSCX — Risk / Return Rank
SCPZX
HRSCX
SCPZX vs. HRSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund (SCPZX) and Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund (HRSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCPZX | HRSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.33 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 3.34 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.32 | 13.74 | -7.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCPZX vs. HRSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCPZX drawdown since its inception was -28.85%, smaller than the maximum HRSCX drawdown of -55.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCPZX and HRSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCPZX | HRSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.85% | -55.68% | +26.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.91% | -12.15% | +9.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.72% | -28.37% | +20.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.39% | -38.22% | +20.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.38% | -38.32% | +19.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | 0.00% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.74% | -11.48% | +7.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 2.95% | -2.03% |
Volatility
SCPZX vs. HRSCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund (SCPZX) is 1.35%, while Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund (HRSCX) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that SCPZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCPZX | HRSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 7.34% | -5.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 16.27% | -13.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04% | 20.54% | -16.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.57% | 23.75% | -17.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.61% | 24.04% | -18.43% |
SCPZX vs. HRSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCPZX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HRSCX's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCPZX vs. HRSCX - Dividend Comparison
SCPZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than HRSCX's 6.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRSCX Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund | 6.87% | 8.42% | 22.56% | 9.37% | 38.95% | 40.00% | 18.51% | 6.62% | 26.17% | 8.10% | 0.06% | 7.03% |
SCPZX Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund | 4.23% | 4.35% | 4.70% | 4.31% | 3.06% | 1.27% | 5.79% | 4.47% | 2.26% | 1.76% | 3.92% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCPZX and HRSCX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HRSCX has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to SCPZX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCPZX dropped -28.85% vs HRSCX's -55.68%.
HRSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCPZX and HRSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer