SCOP vs. CMDY
SCOP (Sprott Physical Copper Trust) and CMDY (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF) are both Commodities funds. SCOP is actively managed, while CMDY is passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCOP charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CMDY.
Performance
SCOP vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCOP
- 1D
- -6.13%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMDY
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 21.44%
- 6M
- 19.87%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- —
SCOP vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCOP Sprott Physical Copper Trust | 2.27% |
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | -5.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCOP and CMDY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCOP vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank
SCOP
CMDY
SCOP vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Copper Trust (SCOP) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCOP | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.53 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
SCOP vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCOP drawdown since its inception was -11.09%, smaller than the maximum CMDY drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCOP and CMDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCOP | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -31.19% | +20.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.72% | -7.04% | -2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -13.14% | +8.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.62% | — |
Volatility
SCOP vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCOP | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.24% | 16.26% | +28.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.24% | 15.83% | +29.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.24% | 14.65% | +30.59% |
SCOP vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCOP has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCOP vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison
SCOP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 10.62% | 12.89% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 3.98% | 16.09% | 0.15% | 2.21% | 1.73% |
SCOP Sprott Physical Copper Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCOP and CMDY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMDY is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMDY is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SCOP.
CMDY has the higher dividend yield at 10.62%, compared with 0.00% for SCOP.
They also come from different issuers: Sprott and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SCOP and 0.28% for CMDY.
Find the right allocation for SCOP and CMDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer