SCOP vs. KCOP
SCOP (Sprott Physical Copper Trust) and KCOP (Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF) are both Copper funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCOP charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for KCOP.
Performance
SCOP vs. KCOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCOP
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KCOP
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -9.72%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCOP vs. KCOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCOP Sprott Physical Copper Trust | -3.17% |
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | -1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCOP and KCOP is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCOP vs. KCOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Copper Trust (SCOP) and Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCOP vs. KCOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCOP drawdown since its inception was -13.22%, smaller than the maximum KCOP drawdown of -21.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCOP and KCOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCOP | KCOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.22% | -21.55% | +8.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.09% | -14.64% | +3.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.54% | -8.65% | +2.11% |
Volatility
SCOP vs. KCOP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCOP | KCOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.87% | 44.30% | -3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.87% | 44.30% | -3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.87% | 44.30% | -3.43% |
SCOP vs. KCOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCOP has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than KCOP's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCOP vs. KCOP - Dividend Comparison
SCOP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KCOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 5.41% |
SCOP Sprott Physical Copper Trust | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCOP and KCOP have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KCOP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KCOP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SCOP.
KCOP has the higher dividend yield at 5.41%, compared with 0.00% for SCOP.
They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SCOP and 0.99% for KCOP.
Find the right allocation for SCOP and KCOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer