PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCO vs. UVXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCO vs. UVXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCO achieves a -57.74% return, which is significantly lower than UVXY's -35.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SCO has outperformed UVXY with an annualized return of -37.09%, while UVXY has yielded a comparatively lower -72.31% annualized return.


SCO

1D
0.03%
1M
18.27%
6M
-55.73%
YTD
-57.74%
1Y
-49.59%
3Y*
-29.10%
5Y*
-37.73%
10Y*
-37.09%

UVXY

1D
-3.58%
1M
-19.32%
6M
-32.32%
YTD
-35.49%
1Y
-72.78%
3Y*
-63.56%
5Y*
-68.08%
10Y*
-72.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCO vs. UVXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCO
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil
-57.74%15.90%-19.00%-12.41%-62.59%-72.62%-4.20%-58.50%19.22%-22.40%
UVXY
ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
-35.49%-65.32%-50.90%-87.70%-44.81%-88.33%-17.38%-84.23%60.10%-94.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SCO and UVXY is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2011

0.22

The correlation between SCO and UVXY shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCO vs. UVXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCO
SCO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

UVXY
UVXY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
UVXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVXY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
UVXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVXY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCO vs. UVXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCOUVXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

0.82

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

-0.99

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.32

-1.49

+0.17

SCO vs. UVXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is comparable to the UVXY Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCO and UVXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCO vs. UVXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCO drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum UVXY drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCO and UVXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCOUVXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.80%

-100.00%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.24%

-73.42%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.14%

-95.32%

+20.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.80%

-99.74%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.51%

-100.00%

+0.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.72%

-100.00%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.24%

-98.75%

+13.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.10%

48.70%

-9.60%

Volatility

SCO vs. UVXY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) is 17.87%, while ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY) has a volatility of 22.69%. This indicates that SCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UVXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCOUVXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.87%

22.69%

-4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.31%

66.50%

-18.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.84%

85.17%

-28.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.20%

103.78%

-43.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.80%

111.99%

-40.19%

SCO vs. UVXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCO and UVXY have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

SCO vs. UVXY - Dividend Comparison

Neither SCO nor UVXY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SCO and UVXY have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UVXY has higher volatility (22.69%) compared to SCO (17.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCO dropped -99.80% vs UVXY's -100.00%.

On 10-year performance, SCO leads with -37.09% vs -72.31% for UVXY. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SCO has been the lower-risk option at 17.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCO has performed better with a -37.09% return vs -72.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCO and UVXY have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

SCO and UVXY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SCO is categorized as Oil & Gas, while UVXY is Volatility. SCO tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%), while UVXY tracks S&P 500 VIX SHORT-TERM FUTURES TR (150%).

UVXY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.85 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCO and UVXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer