SCO vs. TQQQ
SCO (ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SCO is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%), while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCO returned -38.21%/yr vs 44.95%/yr for TQQQ. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SCO vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCO achieves a -67.25% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 61.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SCO has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -38.21%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 44.95% annualized return.
SCO
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- -67.25%
- 6M
- -65.49%
- 1Y
- -67.35%
- 3Y*
- -37.24%
- 5Y*
- -42.35%
- 10Y*
- -38.21%
TQQQ
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 26.46%
- YTD
- 61.91%
- 6M
- 54.01%
- 1Y
- 132.34%
- 3Y*
- 68.49%
- 5Y*
- 27.97%
- 10Y*
- 44.95%
SCO vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCO ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | -67.25% | 15.90% | -19.00% | -12.41% | -62.59% | -72.62% | -4.20% | -58.50% | 19.22% | -22.40% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 61.91% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCO and TQQQ is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010 | -0.21 |
The correlation between SCO and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCO vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SCO
TQQQ
SCO vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCO | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.39 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 3.60 | -4.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.94 | 11.77 | -13.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCO | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.19 | 2.80 | -3.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.71 | 0.42 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.53 | 0.68 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | 0.74 | -1.11 |
Drawdowns
SCO vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCO drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCO and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCO | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -81.66% | -18.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.24% | -36.97% | -35.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.85% | -58.04% | -21.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.80% | -81.66% | -13.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.51% | -81.66% | -17.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.78% | -2.29% | -97.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.18% | -18.52% | -66.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.87% | 11.28% | +23.59% |
Volatility
SCO vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) has a higher volatility of 20.24% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.35%. This indicates that SCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCO | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.24% | 13.35% | +6.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.73% | 36.04% | +9.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.81% | 47.60% | +9.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.76% | 66.50% | -6.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.95% | 65.95% | +6.00% |
SCO vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCO and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SCO vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCO ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.37% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCO and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCO has higher volatility (20.24%) compared to TQQQ (13.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCO dropped -99.80% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.95% vs -38.21% for SCO. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.95% return vs -38.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCO and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for SCO.
SCO is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SCO tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCO and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer