PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCO vs. BITU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SCO vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SCO vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SCO
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil
-55.18%15.90%9.37%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-46.65%-37.07%37.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCO achieves a -55.18% return, which is significantly lower than BITU's -46.65% return.


SCO

1D
5.65%
1M
-31.91%
YTD
-55.18%
6M
-50.11%
1Y
-47.55%
3Y*
-29.63%
5Y*
-41.92%
10Y*
-39.82%

BITU

1D
0.89%
1M
-5.67%
YTD
-46.65%
6M
-72.88%
1Y
-55.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SCO vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCO and BITU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

SCO vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCO
SCO Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCO Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCO vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCOBITUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.84

-0.61

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.20

-0.59

-0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.93

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

-0.67

-0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.71

-1.29

-0.42

SCO vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCO and BITU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCOBITUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.84

-0.61

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.36

-0.32

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between SCO and BITU is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

SCO vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

SCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.08%.


TTM20252024
SCO
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil
0.00%0.00%0.00%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
78.08%50.23%0.12%

Drawdowns

SCO vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCO drawdown since its inception was -99.74%, which is greater than BITU's maximum drawdown of -77.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCO and BITU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SCOBITUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.74%

-77.76%

-21.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.46%

-77.76%

+11.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.70%

-76.14%

-23.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.03%

-31.36%

-53.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.84%

40.50%

-12.66%

Volatility

SCO vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) is 24.45%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 26.02%. This indicates that SCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SCOBITUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.45%

26.02%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.35%

74.12%

-33.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.03%

90.32%

-33.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.08%

99.57%

-40.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.93%

99.57%

-27.64%