PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCNM vs. SCUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCNM vs. SCUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital National Municipal Bond ETF (SCNM) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SCNM

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.07%
6M
1.02%
YTD
1.25%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCUB

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCNM vs. SCUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCNM and SCUB is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCNM vs. SCUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital National Municipal Bond ETF (SCNM) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCNM vs. SCUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCNM vs. SCUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCNM drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, which is greater than SCUB's maximum drawdown of -0.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCNM and SCUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCNMSCUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.81%

-0.10%

-2.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

0.00%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-0.01%

-0.73%

Volatility

SCNM vs. SCUB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCNMSCUBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15%

0.84%

+2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.15%

0.84%

+2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.15%

0.84%

+2.31%

SCNM vs. SCUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCNM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCUB's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCNM vs. SCUB - Dividend Comparison

SCNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than SCUB's 1.33% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCNM and SCUB have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SCNM.

SCNM has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.33% for SCUB.

SCNM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while SCUB is Actively Managed. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SCNM and 0.30% for SCUB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCNM and SCUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer