PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCNM vs. ZMUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCNM vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital National Municipal Bond ETF (SCNM) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCNM achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than ZMUN's 1.59% return.


SCNM

1D
0.18%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZMUN

1D
0.07%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCNM vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCNM and ZMUN is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCNM vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital National Municipal Bond ETF (SCNM) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCNM vs. ZMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCNMZMUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

6.55

-5.71

Drawdowns

SCNM vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCNM drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCNM and ZMUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCNMZMUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.81%

-0.09%

-2.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

0.00%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-0.01%

-0.82%

Volatility

SCNM vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCNMZMUNDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.28%

0.54%

+2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.28%

0.54%

+2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.28%

0.54%

+2.74%

SCNM vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCNM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCNM vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison

SCNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCNM and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZMUN is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZMUN is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SCNM.

ZMUN has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.50% for SCNM.

They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SCNM and 0.30% for ZMUN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCNM and ZMUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer