PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCMC vs. AINP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCMC vs. AINP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Multi-Strategy Income ETF (SCMC) and Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCMC achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than AINP's 1.25% return.


SCMC

1D
0.08%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.87%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AINP

1D
0.14%
1M
0.76%
YTD
1.25%
6M
1.71%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCMC vs. AINP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCMC and AINP is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.77

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCMC vs. AINP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCMC

AINP
AINP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
AINP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINP Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AINP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINP Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCMC vs. AINP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Multi-Strategy Income ETF (SCMC) and Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCMC vs. AINP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCMCAINPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

1.39

-0.07

Drawdowns

SCMC vs. AINP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCMC drawdown since its inception was -1.91%, smaller than the maximum AINP drawdown of -2.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMC and AINP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCMCAINPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-2.61%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.08%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-0.47%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

Volatility

SCMC vs. AINP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCMCAINPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83%

3.27%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.83%

3.62%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.83%

3.62%

-0.79%

SCMC vs. AINP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCMC has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AINP's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCMC vs. AINP - Dividend Comparison

SCMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than AINP's 5.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AINP
Allspring Income Plus ETF
5.77%5.03%0.47%
SCMC
Sterling Capital Multi-Strategy Income ETF
2.17%0.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCMC and AINP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AINP is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AINP is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SCMC.

AINP has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 2.17% for SCMC.

They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SCMC and 0.36% for AINP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCMC and AINP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer