SCMB vs. GUMI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI).

SCMB and GUMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCMB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 11, 2022. GUMI is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jul 23, 2024.

Performance

SCMB vs. GUMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SCMB vs. GUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	-0.51%	3.78%	0.87%
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF	0.72%	3.39%	1.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCMB achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly lower than GUMI's 0.72% return.

SCMB

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -2.42%
• YTD: -0.51%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 3.88%
• 3Y*: 2.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GUMI

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 0.72%
• 6M: 1.40%
• 1Y: 3.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCMB vs. GUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCMB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GUMI's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

GUMI

Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF

SCMB

Schwab Municipal Bond ETF

Return for Risk

SCMB vs. GUMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCMB

SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 49
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 61
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 35

GUMI

GUMI Risk / Return Rank: 98
GUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
GUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
GUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 98
GUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
GUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCMB vs. GUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCMB	GUMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	2.92	-1.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.22	4.55	-3.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.65	-0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.05	6.94	-5.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.98	29.66	-26.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCMB vs. GUMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCMB Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the GUMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCMB and GUMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCMB	GUMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	2.92	-1.98
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	3.35	-2.45

Correlation

The correlation between SCMB and GUMI is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SCMB vs. GUMI - Dividend Comparison

SCMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than GUMI's 2.85% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	3.38%	3.36%	3.34%	3.10%	0.59%
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF	2.85%	2.95%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SCMB vs. GUMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCMB drawdown since its inception was -6.13%, which is greater than GUMI's maximum drawdown of -0.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMB and GUMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCMB	GUMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.13%	-0.48%	-5.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.79%	-0.48%	-3.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.42%	0.00%	-2.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-0.05%	-1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.34%	0.11%	+1.23%

Volatility

SCMB vs. GUMI - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) has a higher volatility of 1.47% compared to Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) at 0.18%. This indicates that SCMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCMB	GUMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.47%	0.18%	+1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.02%	0.75%	+1.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.15%	1.15%	+3.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.22%	1.01%	+3.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.22%	1.01%	+3.21%