PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCLX vs. GRFS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SCLX vs. GRFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scilex Holding Company (SCLX) and Grifols, S.A. (GRFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCLX achieves a -9.56% return, which is significantly higher than GRFS's -22.14% return.


SCLX

1D
-8.03%
1M
80.58%
YTD
-9.56%
6M
-22.68%
1Y
124.71%
3Y*
-63.15%
5Y*
-49.84%
10Y*

GRFS

1D
-1.62%
1M
-8.77%
YTD
-22.14%
6M
-19.82%
1Y
-15.59%
3Y*
-6.06%
5Y*
-15.65%
10Y*
-6.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCLX vs. GRFS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SCLX
Scilex Holding Company
-9.56%-18.25%-79.10%-48.87%-60.26%1.93%
GRFS
Grifols, S.A.
-22.14%27.79%-35.64%36.00%-24.31%-25.64%

Correlation

The correlation between SCLX and GRFS is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2021

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SCLX:

$75.80M

GRFS:

$4.95B

EPS

SCLX:

-$35.27

GRFS:

€0.61

PS Ratio

SCLX:

2.59

GRFS:

0.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

SCLX:

$30.25M

GRFS:

€7.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SCLX:

$18.07M

GRFS:

€2.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

SCLX:

-$352.83M

GRFS:

€1.56B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCLX vs. GRFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCLX
SCLX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

GRFS
GRFS Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GRFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRFS Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GRFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRFS Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCLX vs. GRFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scilex Holding Company (SCLX) and Grifols, S.A. (GRFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCLXGRFSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.94

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

-0.49

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.31

-0.89

+3.20

SCLX vs. GRFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the GRFS Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCLX and GRFS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCLX vs. GRFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCLX drawdown since its inception was -99.23%, which is greater than GRFS's maximum drawdown of -78.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCLX and GRFS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCLXGRFSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.23%

-78.01%

-21.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-80.27%

-32.22%

-48.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.20%

-52.68%

-45.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.23%

-69.29%

-29.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.87%

-70.24%

-27.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.08%

-31.83%

-25.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

54.23%

17.58%

+36.65%

Volatility

SCLX vs. GRFS - Volatility Comparison

Scilex Holding Company (SCLX) has a higher volatility of 44.68% compared to Grifols, S.A. (GRFS) at 6.88%. This indicates that SCLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCLXGRFSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.68%

6.88%

+37.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.51%

24.38%

+51.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

125.36%

31.82%

+93.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

112.53%

48.78%

+63.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.27%

40.32%

+68.95%

Dividends

SCLX vs. GRFS - Dividend Comparison

SCLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRFS
Grifols, S.A.
2.41%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.20%0.83%1.55%2.32%1.24%1.67%2.01%
SCLX
Scilex Holding Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SCLX vs. GRFS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Scilex Holding Company and Grifols, S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
4.79M
1.73B
(SCLX) Total Revenue
(GRFS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SCLX values in USD, GRFS values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


SCLX and GRFS have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCLX has higher volatility (44.68%) compared to GRFS (6.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCLX dropped -99.23% vs GRFS's -78.01%.

SCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCLX and GRFS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer