PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRFS vs. MIRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GRFS vs. MIRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grifols, S.A. (GRFS) and MIRA Pharmaceuticals Inc. Common Stock (MIRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRFS achieves a -22.14% return, which is significantly higher than MIRA's -36.99% return.


GRFS

1D
-1.62%
1M
-8.77%
YTD
-22.14%
6M
-19.82%
1Y
-15.59%
3Y*
-6.06%
5Y*
-15.65%
10Y*
-6.28%

MIRA

1D
-0.09%
1M
-4.08%
YTD
-36.99%
6M
-38.21%
1Y
-22.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRFS vs. MIRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GRFS
Grifols, S.A.
-22.14%27.79%-35.64%14.46%
MIRA
MIRA Pharmaceuticals Inc. Common Stock
-36.99%32.46%8.57%-85.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GRFS and MIRA is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2023

0.10

The correlation between GRFS and MIRA shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

GRFS:

€0.61

MIRA:

-$1.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

GRFS:

€7.45B

MIRA:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

GRFS:

€2.81B

MIRA:

$0.00

EBITDA (TTM)

GRFS:

€1.56B

MIRA:

-$6.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRFS vs. MIRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRFS
GRFS Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GRFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRFS Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GRFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRFS Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

MIRA
MIRA Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MIRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIRA Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MIRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIRA Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRFS vs. MIRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grifols, S.A. (GRFS) and MIRA Pharmaceuticals Inc. Common Stock (MIRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRFSMIRADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.01

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

-0.41

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

-0.62

-0.27

GRFS vs. MIRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRFS Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the MIRA Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRFS and MIRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRFS vs. MIRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRFS drawdown since its inception was -78.01%, smaller than the maximum MIRA drawdown of -92.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRFS and MIRA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRFSMIRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.01%

-92.69%

+14.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.22%

-54.46%

+22.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.24%

-87.18%

+16.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.83%

-78.41%

+46.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.58%

35.69%

-18.11%

Volatility

GRFS vs. MIRA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grifols, S.A. (GRFS) is 6.88%, while MIRA Pharmaceuticals Inc. Common Stock (MIRA) has a volatility of 21.72%. This indicates that GRFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRFSMIRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.88%

21.72%

-14.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.38%

46.64%

-22.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.82%

79.35%

-47.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.78%

392.43%

-343.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.32%

392.43%

-352.11%

Dividends

GRFS vs. MIRA - Dividend Comparison

GRFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, while MIRA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRFS
Grifols, S.A.
2.41%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.20%0.83%1.55%2.32%1.24%1.67%2.01%
MIRA
MIRA Pharmaceuticals Inc. Common Stock
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GRFS vs. MIRA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grifols, S.A. and MIRA Pharmaceuticals Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.73B
0
(GRFS) Total Revenue
(MIRA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GRFS values in EUR, MIRA values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


GRFS and MIRA have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIRA has higher volatility (21.72%) compared to GRFS (6.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRFS dropped -78.01% vs MIRA's -92.69%.

MIRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRFS and MIRA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer