SCLS vs. BCI

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SCLS (Stoneport Advisors Commodity Long Short ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both Commodities funds - SCLS tracks the Stoneport Advisors Dynamic Commodity Index - Total Return while BCI tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. Both are passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCLS charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for BCI.

Performance

SCLS vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stoneport Advisors Commodity Long Short ETF (SCLS) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SCLS having a 17.54% return and BCI slightly lower at 16.69%.

SCLS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -5.91%
• YTD: 17.54%
• 6M: 17.47%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCI

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -8.66%
• YTD: 16.69%
• 6M: 16.52%
• 1Y: 22.05%
• 3Y*: 11.86%
• 5Y*: 9.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCLS vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SCLS Stoneport Advisors Commodity Long Short ETF	17.54%	1.61%
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	16.69%	1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SCLS and BCI is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025	0.60

Return for Risk

SCLS vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCLS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 38
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 37
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCLS vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stoneport Advisors Commodity Long Short ETF (SCLS) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCLS	BCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.29	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.76	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.84	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.82	—

Drawdowns

SCLS vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCLS drawdown since its inception was -7.90%, smaller than the maximum BCI drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCLS and BCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCLS	BCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.90%	-32.69%	+24.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.04%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.04%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.85%	-12.04%	+4.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-11.98%	+10.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SCLS	BCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.38%	17.18%	+1.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.38%	16.79%	+1.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.38%	15.65%	+2.73%

SCLS vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCLS has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCLS vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

SCLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than BCI's 14.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	14.13%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%
SCLS Stoneport Advisors Commodity Long Short ETF	0.33%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCLS and BCI in my portfolio?

SCLS and BCI have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SCLS or BCI?

On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCLS or BCI?

BCI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for SCLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCLS or BCI?

BCI has the higher dividend yield at 14.13%, compared with 0.33% for SCLS.

What is the main difference between SCLS and BCI?

SCLS tracks Stoneport Advisors Dynamic Commodity Index - Total Return, while BCI tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. They also come from different issuers: Stoneport Advisors and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for SCLS and 0.26% for BCI.