SCLS vs. ZSC
SCLS (Stoneport Advisors Commodity Long Short ETF) and ZSC (USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds. SCLS is passively managed, while ZSC is actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCLS charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for ZSC.
Performance
SCLS vs. ZSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCLS achieves a 21.94% return, which is significantly higher than ZSC's 6.19% return.
SCLS
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 21.94%
- 6M
- 21.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZSC
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -3.64%
- YTD
- 6.19%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 30.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCLS vs. ZSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCLS Stoneport Advisors Commodity Long Short ETF | 21.94% | 1.61% |
ZSC USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund | 6.19% | 3.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCLS and ZSC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCLS vs. ZSC — Risk / Return Rank
SCLS
ZSC
SCLS vs. ZSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stoneport Advisors Commodity Long Short ETF (SCLS) and USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCLS | ZSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.39 | 0.12 | +2.27 |
Drawdowns
SCLS vs. ZSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCLS drawdown since its inception was -7.90%, smaller than the maximum ZSC drawdown of -26.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCLS and ZSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCLS | ZSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -26.49% | +18.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.41% | -5.63% | +1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -14.71% | +13.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.52% | — |
Volatility
SCLS vs. ZSC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCLS | ZSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.77% | 12.93% | +5.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 12.31% | +6.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 12.31% | +6.46% |
SCLS vs. ZSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCLS has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCLS vs. ZSC - Dividend Comparison
SCLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than ZSC's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCLS Stoneport Advisors Commodity Long Short ETF | 0.32% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZSC USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund | 1.65% | 1.75% | 2.18% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCLS and ZSC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZSC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZSC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for SCLS.
ZSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.32% for SCLS.
They also come from different issuers: Stoneport Advisors and USCF. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for SCLS and 0.59% for ZSC.
Find the right allocation for SCLS and ZSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer