PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHZ vs. ABNFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHZ vs. ABNFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHZ achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly higher than ABNFX's -0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHZ has underperformed ABNFX with an annualized return of 1.37%, while ABNFX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.75% annualized return.


SCHZ

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.65%
6M
-0.40%
YTD
-0.14%
1Y
3.63%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*
1.37%

ABNFX

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.26%
6M
-0.25%
YTD
-0.25%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
-0.28%
10Y*
1.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHZ vs. ABNFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHZ
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
-0.14%7.24%1.26%5.60%-13.17%-1.72%7.46%8.65%-0.26%3.50%
ABNFX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2
-0.25%7.42%1.42%4.29%-13.08%-0.88%10.86%8.08%0.15%3.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHZ and ABNFX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2011

0.88

The correlation between SCHZ and ABNFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHZ vs. ABNFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHZ
SCHZ Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SCHZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

ABNFX
ABNFX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ABNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ABNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHZ vs. ABNFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHZABNFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.16

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

1.11

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

3.03

+0.75

SCHZ vs. ABNFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the ABNFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHZ and ABNFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHZ vs. ABNFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHZ drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, which is greater than ABNFX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHZ and ABNFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHZABNFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-17.69%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-3.09%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.18%

-6.12%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.01%

-17.65%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.74%

-17.69%

-1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-2.35%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-3.28%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.13%

-0.17%

Volatility

SCHZ vs. ABNFX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX) at 1.11%. This indicates that SCHZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABNFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHZABNFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

1.11%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

2.98%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.74%

3.83%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.10%

5.97%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.42%

4.90%

+0.52%

SCHZ vs. ABNFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHZ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ABNFX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHZ vs. ABNFX - Dividend Comparison

SCHZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, less than ABNFX's 4.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABNFX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2
4.41%4.37%4.55%3.19%2.37%2.07%5.15%3.72%2.65%2.10%2.31%2.24%
SCHZ
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.17%4.05%3.96%3.28%2.63%2.16%2.43%2.79%2.56%2.40%2.24%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHZ and ABNFX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHZ has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to ABNFX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHZ dropped -18.74% vs ABNFX's -17.69%.

SCHZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHZ and ABNFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer