PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABNFX vs. CGCP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABNFX vs. CGCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX) and Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABNFX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than CGCP's 0.65% return.


ABNFX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.30%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
-0.02%
10Y*
1.93%

CGCP

1D
0.13%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.65%
6M
0.90%
1Y
6.27%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABNFX vs. CGCP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ABNFX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2
0.19%7.42%1.42%4.29%-9.49%
CGCP
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
0.65%7.35%2.95%7.17%-9.78%

Correlation

The correlation between ABNFX and CGCP is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.91

The correlation between ABNFX and CGCP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABNFX vs. CGCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABNFX
ABNFX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ABNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ABNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

CGCP
CGCP Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CGCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGCP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CGCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGCP Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABNFX vs. CGCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX) and Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABNFXCGCPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

1.71

-0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.92

2.54

-0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.31

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

2.29

-0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.34

7.60

-2.25

ABNFX vs. CGCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABNFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the CGCP Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABNFX and CGCP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABNFXCGCPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.71

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.27

+0.38

Drawdowns

ABNFX vs. CGCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABNFX drawdown since its inception was -17.69%, which is greater than CGCP's maximum drawdown of -15.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNFX and CGCP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABNFXCGCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.69%

-15.06%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.09%

-2.59%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.12%

-5.37%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-0.85%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-4.93%

+1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

0.78%

+0.25%

Volatility

ABNFX vs. CGCP - Volatility Comparison

American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) at 1.32%. This indicates that ABNFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGCP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABNFXCGCPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

1.32%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.84%

2.73%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96%

3.70%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.96%

6.36%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.89%

6.36%

-1.47%

ABNFX vs. CGCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABNFX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CGCP's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABNFX vs. CGCP - Dividend Comparison

ABNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than CGCP's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABNFX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2
4.38%4.37%4.55%3.19%2.37%2.07%5.15%3.72%2.65%2.10%2.31%2.24%
CGCP
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
5.14%5.10%5.17%4.98%2.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABNFX and CGCP have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABNFX has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to CGCP (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABNFX dropped -17.69% vs CGCP's -15.06%.

CGCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABNFX and CGCP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer