SCHX vs. XLP
SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHX returned 15.35%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for XLP. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.
Performance
SCHX vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 8.86% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHX has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 15.35%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.60% annualized return.
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 25.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
XLP
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
SCHX vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 8.86% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 11.10% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHX and XLP is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCHX and XLP has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SCHX vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHX
XLP
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SCHX
XLP
-
Communication Services
SCHX
XLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHX
XLP
Financial Services
SCHX
XLP
-
Healthcare
SCHX
XLP
-
Industrials
SCHX
XLP
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHX
XLP
Energy
SCHX
XLP
-
Utilities
SCHX
XLP
-
Basic Materials
SCHX
XLP
-
Real Estate
SCHX
XLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHX vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank
SCHX
XLP
SCHX vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHX | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.11 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 0.79 | +1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.65 | 1.52 | +10.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHX vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, roughly equal to the maximum XLP drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and XLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHX | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.33% | -35.90% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -9.69% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.04% | -12.39% | -6.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | -16.30% | -9.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.33% | -24.51% | -9.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | -4.12% | +1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -7.06% | +3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 5.01% | -2.97% |
Volatility
SCHX vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) have volatilities of 4.47% and 4.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHX | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 4.53% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 10.14% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.47% | 12.90% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 13.34% | +3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 14.75% | +3.42% |
SCHX vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHX vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than XLP's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.53% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHX and XLP have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLP has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to SCHX (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs XLP's -35.90%.
On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 15.35% vs 7.60% for XLP. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLP.
XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.02% for SCHX.
SCHX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHX and 0.08% for XLP.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHX and XLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer