SCHX vs. VB
SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHX returned 15.20%/yr vs 11.18%/yr for VB. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.
Performance
SCHX vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 12.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHX has outperformed VB with an annualized return of 15.20%, while VB has yielded a comparatively lower 11.18% annualized return.
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 24.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.87%
- 10Y*
- 15.20%
VB
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 25.97%
- 3Y*
- 15.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.18%
SCHX vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 8.56% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 12.60% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHX and VB is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SCHX and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHX vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHX
VB
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SCHX
VB
Communication Services
SCHX
VB
Financial Services
SCHX
VB
Consumer Cyclical
SCHX
VB
Industrials
SCHX
VB
Healthcare
SCHX
VB
Consumer Defensive
SCHX
VB
Energy
SCHX
VB
Utilities
SCHX
VB
Real Estate
SCHX
VB
Basic Materials
SCHX
VB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHX vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
SCHX
VB
SCHX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 2.91 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.15 | 10.66 | +1.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.59 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.32 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.52 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.44 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
SCHX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.33% | -59.56% | +25.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -8.98% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.04% | -25.36% | +6.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | -28.15% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.33% | -42.05% | +7.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -2.04% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -8.43% | +4.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 2.44% | -0.44% |
Volatility
SCHX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is 3.84%, while Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that SCHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 4.62% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.44% | 11.97% | -2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 16.45% | -4.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 20.77% | -3.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 21.44% | -3.27% |
SCHX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than VB's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.21% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHX and VB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VB has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to SCHX (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs VB's -59.56%.
On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 15.20% vs 11.18% for VB. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 15.20% return vs 11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VB.
VB has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 1.03% for SCHX.
SCHX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHX and 0.05% for VB.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHX and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer