SCHX vs. SYLD
SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and SYLD (Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while SYLD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. SCHX is passively managed, while SYLD is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHX returned 15.35%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for SYLD. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SYLD.
Performance
SCHX vs. SYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 8.86% return, which is significantly lower than SYLD's 17.19% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHX has outperformed SYLD with an annualized return of 15.35%, while SYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 13.58% annualized return.
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 25.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
SYLD
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 17.19%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
SCHX vs. SYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 8.86% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 17.19% | 3.94% | 3.37% | 16.46% | -6.14% | 48.59% | 13.61% | 26.98% | -13.51% | 20.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHX and SYLD is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCHX and SYLD has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SCHX vs. SYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHX
SYLD
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
SCHX
SYLD
Communication Services
SCHX
SYLD
Financial Services
SCHX
SYLD
Consumer Cyclical
SCHX
SYLD
Industrials
SCHX
SYLD
Healthcare
SCHX
SYLD
Consumer Defensive
SCHX
SYLD
Energy
SCHX
SYLD
Utilities
SCHX
SYLD
-
Real Estate
SCHX
SYLD
-
Basic Materials
SCHX
SYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHX vs. SYLD — Risk / Return Rank
SCHX
SYLD
SCHX vs. SYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHX | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 4.07 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.65 | 11.04 | +0.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHX vs. SYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, smaller than the maximum SYLD drawdown of -45.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and SYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHX | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.33% | -45.36% | +11.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -6.93% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.04% | -26.62% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | -26.62% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.33% | -45.36% | +11.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | 0.00% | -2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -5.65% | +1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.55% | -0.51% |
Volatility
SCHX vs. SYLD - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) at 3.35%. This indicates that SCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHX | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 3.35% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 9.75% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.47% | 15.59% | -3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 20.61% | -3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 22.95% | -4.78% |
SCHX vs. SYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHX vs. SYLD - Dividend Comparison
SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than SYLD's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.81% | 2.25% | 2.04% | 1.92% | 2.20% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 2.08% | 2.52% | 1.57% | 1.92% | 6.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHX and SYLD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHX has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to SYLD (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs SYLD's -45.36%.
On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 15.35% vs 13.58% for SYLD. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SYLD.
SYLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.02% for SCHX.
SCHX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SYLD is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHX and 0.59% for SYLD.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHX and SYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer