SCHX vs. SMH
SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHX returned 15.57%/yr vs 38.18%/yr for SMH. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
SCHX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 79.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHX has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 15.57%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 38.18% annualized return.
SCHX
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 11.21%
- 1Y
- 27.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.28%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
SMH
- 1D
- 4.38%
- 1M
- 16.31%
- YTD
- 79.69%
- 6M
- 83.94%
- 1Y
- 152.58%
- 3Y*
- 62.32%
- 5Y*
- 39.72%
- 10Y*
- 38.18%
SCHX vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.76% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 79.69% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHX and SMH is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.77 |
The correlation between SCHX and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHX vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHX
SMH
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SCHX
SMH
Communication Services
SCHX
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHX
SMH
-
Financial Services
SCHX
SMH
-
Healthcare
SCHX
SMH
-
Industrials
SCHX
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHX
SMH
-
Energy
SCHX
SMH
-
Utilities
SCHX
SMH
-
Basic Materials
SCHX
SMH
-
Real Estate
SCHX
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHX vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
SCHX
SMH
SCHX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.65 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 10.28 | -7.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.44 | 37.77 | -24.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.33% | -84.96% | +50.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -14.93% | +5.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.04% | -35.74% | +16.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | -45.30% | +19.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.33% | -45.30% | +10.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | 0.00% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -41.04% | +37.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 4.06% | -2.02% |
Volatility
SCHX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is 4.73%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.71%. This indicates that SCHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 16.71% | -11.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | 27.97% | -18.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.54% | 33.39% | -20.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 35.53% | -18.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 32.86% | -14.67% |
SCHX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHX and SMH have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.71%) compared to SCHX (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 38.18% vs 15.57% for SCHX. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 38.18% return vs 15.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
SCHX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHX and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.61 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHX and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer