SCHX vs. QUS
SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and QUS (State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHX returned 15.03%/yr vs 13.54%/yr for QUS. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SCHX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
SCHX vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 11.65% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 10.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHX has outperformed QUS with an annualized return of 15.03%, while QUS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.54% annualized return.
SCHX
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- YTD
- 11.65%
- 1Y
- 22.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.49%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.61%
QUS
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 19.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.01M | $4.81M | $3.43M | |
| $244.71M | $275.73M | $370.20M |
SCHX vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 11.65% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 10.23% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -14.15% | 26.72% | 12.40% | 32.45% | -3.66% | 21.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHX and QUS is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SCHX and QUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHX vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHX
QUS
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SCHX
QUS
Financial Services
SCHX
QUS
Communication Services
SCHX
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
SCHX
QUS
Industrials
SCHX
QUS
Healthcare
SCHX
QUS
Consumer Defensive
SCHX
QUS
Energy
SCHX
QUS
Utilities
SCHX
QUS
Real Estate
SCHX
QUS
Basic Materials
SCHX
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHX vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
SCHX
QUS
SCHX vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHX | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.39 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 2.90 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.64 | 12.95 | -2.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHX vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, roughly equal to the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHX | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.33% | -33.78% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -6.85% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.04% | -13.94% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | -22.30% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.33% | -33.78% | -0.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -3.66% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 1.53% | +0.61% |
Volatility
SCHX vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 2.42%. This indicates that SCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHX | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 2.42% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.19% | 6.97% | +3.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.91% | 9.22% | +3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 14.32% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 16.40% | +1.76% |
SCHX vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHX vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than QUS's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.27% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHX and QUS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to QUS (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs QUS's -33.78%.
On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 15.03% vs 13.54% for QUS. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 15.03% return vs 13.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUS.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 1.02% for SCHX.
SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHX and 0.15% for QUS.
QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHX and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer