SCHX vs. PSCX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SCHX is passively managed, while PSCX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHX returned 12.44%/yr vs 8.22%/yr for PSCX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.

Performance

SCHX vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 4.46% return.

SCHX

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: -1.16%
• YTD: 8.04%
• 6M: 7.00%
• 1Y: 23.07%
• 3Y*: 20.75%
• 5Y*: 12.44%
• 10Y*: 15.47%

PSCX

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -0.08%
• YTD: 4.46%
• 6M: 4.60%
• 1Y: 14.18%
• 3Y*: 12.23%
• 5Y*: 8.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHX vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF	8.04%	17.46%	24.88%	26.84%	-19.41%	26.81%	1.31%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	4.46%	12.08%	13.27%	16.57%	-7.35%	9.03%	0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHX and PSCX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2020	0.90

The correlation between SCHX and PSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHX vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHX	PSCX
Technology	37.8%	33.2%
Financial Services	10.4%	12.5%
Communication Services	9.8%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	10.0%
Industrials	8.8%	8.4%
Healthcare	8.5%	9.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	5.4%
Energy	3.1%	4.2%
Utilities	2.6%	2.6%
Real Estate	2.0%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.9%

Return for Risk

SCHX vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHX

SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 56
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

PSCX

PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 84
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHX vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHX	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	2.53	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	3.75	-1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.51	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	3.39	-0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.26	17.03	-5.77

SCHX vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the PSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHX and PSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHX vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and PSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHX	PSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.33%	-10.20%	-24.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.02%	-4.20%	-4.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.04%	-9.61%	-9.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.41%	-10.20%	-15.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.11%	-0.75%	-2.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.96%	-1.85%	-2.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	0.83%	+1.22%

Volatility

SCHX vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 1.79%. This indicates that SCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHX	PSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.89%	1.79%	+3.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.94%	4.52%	+5.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.65%	5.65%	+7.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.23%	7.11%	+10.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.16%	6.97%	+11.19%

SCHX vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHX vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF	1.03%	1.09%	1.22%	1.39%	1.64%	1.22%	1.64%	1.82%	2.02%	1.70%	1.92%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHX and PSCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, SCHX and PSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SCHX or PSCX?

SCHX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to PSCX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs PSCX's -10.20%.

Which ETF is better, SCHX or PSCX?

On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 12.44% vs 8.22% for PSCX. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHX or PSCX?

Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 12.44% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHX or PSCX?

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHX or PSCX?

SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

What is the main difference between SCHX and PSCX?

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHX and 0.75% for PSCX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.