PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHX vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHX vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 32.00% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHX has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 15.47%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.49% annualized return.


SCHX

1D
-1.29%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
8.04%
6M
7.00%
1Y
23.07%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
12.44%
10Y*
15.47%

MTUM

1D
-4.48%
1M
8.74%
YTD
32.00%
6M
29.92%
1Y
41.78%
3Y*
33.87%
5Y*
15.18%
10Y*
17.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHX vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
8.04%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%31.22%-4.66%21.95%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
32.00%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHX and MTUM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.86

The correlation between SCHX and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHX vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHX
MTUM

Technology

37.8%
50.2%

Financial Services

10.4%
5.0%

Communication Services

9.8%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
2.9%

Industrials

8.8%
15.0%

Healthcare

8.5%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
3.7%

Energy

3.1%
10.5%

Utilities

2.6%
0.6%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.3%

Technology

SCHX
37.8%
MTUM
50.2%

Financial Services

SCHX
10.4%
MTUM
5.0%

Communication Services

SCHX
9.8%
MTUM
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHX
9.4%
MTUM
2.9%

Industrials

SCHX
8.8%
MTUM
15.0%

Healthcare

SCHX
8.5%
MTUM
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

SCHX
4.5%
MTUM
3.7%

Energy

SCHX
3.1%
MTUM
10.5%

Utilities

SCHX
2.6%
MTUM
0.6%

Real Estate

SCHX
2.0%
MTUM
1.3%

Basic Materials

SCHX
1.8%
MTUM
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHX vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHX vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHXMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

3.64

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.26

13.91

-2.66

SCHX vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHX and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHX vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, roughly equal to the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHXMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.33%

-34.08%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-11.54%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.04%

-20.99%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

-32.28%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

-34.08%

-0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.11%

-4.48%

+1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-6.19%

+2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

3.01%

-0.96%

Volatility

SCHX vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is 4.89%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 12.20%. This indicates that SCHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHXMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

12.20%

-7.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

19.44%

-9.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.65%

21.93%

-9.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

21.15%

-3.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%

21.31%

-3.15%

SCHX vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHX vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than MTUM's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.56%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.03%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHX and MTUM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to SCHX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.49% vs 15.47% for SCHX. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.49% return vs 15.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.

SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.56% for MTUM.

SCHX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHX and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHX and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer