SCHX vs. COWZ
SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHX returned 12.76%/yr vs 10.13%/yr for COWZ. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.
Performance
SCHX vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 8.86% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 6.93% return.
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 25.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
COWZ
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 19.20%
- 3Y*
- 13.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 8.86% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 6.93% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 23.41% | -10.05% | 20.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHX and COWZ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCHX and COWZ has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SCHX vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHX
COWZ
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
SCHX
COWZ
Communication Services
SCHX
COWZ
Financial Services
SCHX
COWZ
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHX
COWZ
Industrials
SCHX
COWZ
Healthcare
SCHX
COWZ
Consumer Defensive
SCHX
COWZ
Energy
SCHX
COWZ
Utilities
SCHX
COWZ
-
Real Estate
SCHX
COWZ
-
Basic Materials
SCHX
COWZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHX vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
SCHX
COWZ
SCHX vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHX | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.29 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 3.65 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.65 | 9.73 | +1.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHX vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and COWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHX | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.33% | -38.63% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -5.00% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.04% | -22.00% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | -22.00% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | -2.05% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -4.80% | +0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 1.88% | +0.16% |
Volatility
SCHX vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 3.27%. This indicates that SCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHX | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 3.27% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 7.20% | +2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.47% | 11.19% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 17.64% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 19.91% | -1.74% |
SCHX vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHX vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than COWZ's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.93% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHX and COWZ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHX has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to COWZ (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs COWZ's -38.63%.
On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 12.76% vs 10.13% for COWZ. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 10.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.
COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.02% for SCHX.
SCHX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHX and 0.49% for COWZ.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHX and COWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer