SCHV vs. TSPA
SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) and TSPA (T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while TSPA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. SCHV is passively managed, while TSPA is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SCHV returned 18.05%/yr vs 22.03%/yr for TSPA. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for TSPA.
Performance
SCHV vs. TSPA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than TSPA's 9.02% return.
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 15.31%
- 1Y
- 26.78%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
TSPA
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 9.02%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 24.38%
- 3Y*
- 22.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHV vs. TSPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 14.24% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 7.42% |
TSPA T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF | 9.02% | 16.44% | 26.37% | 29.95% | -18.70% | 13.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHV and TSPA is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021 | 0.81 |
The correlation between SCHV and TSPA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHV vs. TSPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHV
TSPA
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Financial Services
SCHV
TSPA
Technology
SCHV
TSPA
Industrials
SCHV
TSPA
Healthcare
SCHV
TSPA
Consumer Defensive
SCHV
TSPA
Energy
SCHV
TSPA
Consumer Cyclical
SCHV
TSPA
Utilities
SCHV
TSPA
Real Estate
SCHV
TSPA
Basic Materials
SCHV
TSPA
Communication Services
SCHV
TSPA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHV vs. TSPA — Risk / Return Rank
SCHV
TSPA
SCHV vs. TSPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHV | TSPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.36 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 2.65 | +1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.87 | 12.24 | +3.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHV | TSPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 1.95 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.83 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
SCHV vs. TSPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than TSPA's maximum drawdown of -24.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and TSPA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHV | TSPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | -24.72% | -12.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -9.24% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.26% | -19.04% | +3.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.78% | -24.72% | +4.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -2.71% | +1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -5.48% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 2.00% | -0.31% |
Volatility
SCHV vs. TSPA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) is 3.33%, while T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that SCHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHV | TSPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 3.90% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 9.88% | -1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.80% | 12.57% | -1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 17.03% | -2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 17.03% | -0.08% |
SCHV vs. TSPA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TSPA's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHV vs. TSPA - Dividend Comparison
SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than TSPA's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
TSPA T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.50% | 0.41% | 1.16% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHV and TSPA have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSPA has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to SCHV (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs TSPA's -24.72%.
On 3-year performance, TSPA leads with 22.03% vs 18.05% for SCHV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHV has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TSPA has performed better with a 22.03% return vs 18.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for TSPA.
SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.57% for TSPA.
SCHV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while TSPA is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHV and 0.34% for TSPA.
SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHV and TSPA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer