SCHR vs. VGVT
SCHR (Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and VGVT (Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while VGVT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Vanguard. SCHR is passively managed, while VGVT is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHR charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VGVT.
Performance
SCHR vs. VGVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHR achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than VGVT's 0.29% return.
SCHR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 2.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.53%
- 5Y*
- 0.10%
- 10Y*
- 1.14%
VGVT
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHR vs. VGVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -0.43% | 3.34% |
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF | 0.29% | 3.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHR and VGVT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHR vs. VGVT — Risk / Return Rank
SCHR
VGVT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHR vs. VGVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) and Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHR | VGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHR vs. VGVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHR drawdown since its inception was -16.11%, which is greater than VGVT's maximum drawdown of -2.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHR and VGVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHR | VGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -2.77% | -13.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | -1.57% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -0.73% | -2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | — | — |
Volatility
SCHR vs. VGVT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHR | VGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.42% | 3.24% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 3.24% | +2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 3.24% | +1.23% |
SCHR vs. VGVT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VGVT's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHR vs. VGVT - Dividend Comparison
SCHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than VGVT's 3.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.77% | 3.16% | 2.02% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 2.31% | 2.11% | 1.65% | 1.45% | 1.56% |
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF | 3.98% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHR and VGVT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VGVT.
VGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 3.92% for SCHR.
SCHR is categorized as Government Bonds, while VGVT is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHR and 0.10% for VGVT.
Find the right allocation for SCHR and VGVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer