VGVT vs. BND
VGVT (Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGVT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Vanguard, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. VGVT is actively managed, while BND is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VGVT charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
VGVT vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGVT achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 0.27% return.
VGVT
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
VGVT vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF | 0.11% | 3.28% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.27% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGVT and BND is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGVT vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
VGVT
BND
VGVT vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGVT | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.59 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
VGVT vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGVT drawdown since its inception was -2.77%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGVT and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGVT | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -18.58% | +15.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -2.37% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -3.06% | +2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.88% | — |
Volatility
VGVT vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGVT | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22% | 3.78% | -0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.22% | 6.02% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.22% | 5.53% | -2.31% |
VGVT vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGVT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VGVT vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
VGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, which matches BND's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.97% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF | 3.99% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGVT and BND have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VGVT.
VGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 3.97% for BND.
VGVT is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while BND is Total Bond Market. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VGVT and 0.03% for BND.
Find the right allocation for VGVT and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer