SCHR vs. FLJP
SCHR (Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while FLJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHR returned 0.02%/yr vs 8.82%/yr for FLJP. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHR charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLJP.
Performance
SCHR vs. FLJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHR achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than FLJP's 14.83% return.
SCHR
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- 3.42%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- 0.02%
- 10Y*
- 1.19%
FLJP
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 6M
- 14.62%
- 1Y
- 31.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.82%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHR vs. FLJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -0.27% | 7.33% | 1.42% | 4.27% | -10.58% | -2.62% | 7.72% | 6.18% | 1.46% | -0.57% |
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 14.83% | 26.79% | 6.99% | 20.00% | -16.57% | 0.99% | 15.76% | 18.99% | -14.01% | 2.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHR and FLJP is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.01 |
Over the past year, SCHR and FLJP have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHR vs. FLJP — Risk / Return Rank
SCHR
FLJP
SCHR vs. FLJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHR | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.30 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 2.33 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.29 | 8.10 | -4.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHR vs. FLJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHR drawdown since its inception was -16.11%, smaller than the maximum FLJP drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHR and FLJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHR | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -32.49% | +16.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -13.30% | +10.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.35% | -14.17% | +9.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.07% | -32.49% | +17.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -1.49% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -9.34% | +5.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 3.83% | -2.84% |
Volatility
SCHR vs. FLJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) is 1.11%, while Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that SCHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHR | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 5.62% | -4.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.40% | 15.45% | -13.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.38% | 19.47% | -16.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 17.86% | -12.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 17.84% | -13.37% |
SCHR vs. FLJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FLJP's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHR vs. FLJP - Dividend Comparison
SCHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than FLJP's 4.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 4.48% | 5.15% | 4.56% | 3.00% | 1.92% | 2.40% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 1.50% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.91% | 3.85% | 3.77% | 3.16% | 2.02% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 2.31% | 2.11% | 1.65% | 1.45% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHR and FLJP have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLJP has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to SCHR (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHR dropped -16.11% vs FLJP's -32.49%.
On 5-year performance, FLJP leads with 8.82% vs 0.02% for SCHR. On fees, SCHR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SCHR has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLJP has performed better with a 8.82% return vs 0.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLJP.
FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 3.91% for SCHR.
SCHR is categorized as Government Bonds, while FLJP is Japan Equities. SCHR tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while FLJP tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHR and 0.09% for FLJP.
FLJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHR and FLJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer