SCHQ vs. SCHY
SCHQ (Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and SCHY (Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHQ is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index, while SCHY is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones International Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHQ returned -5.29%/yr vs 7.96%/yr for SCHY. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHQ charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for SCHY.
Performance
SCHQ vs. SCHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHQ achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than SCHY's 7.94% return.
SCHQ
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -1.74%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- -0.72%
- 5Y*
- -5.29%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHY
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 22.39%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHQ vs. SCHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -0.43% | 5.50% | -6.44% | 3.43% | -29.44% | 7.64% |
SCHY Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | 7.94% | 33.98% | -1.79% | 14.27% | -9.43% | 4.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHQ and SCHY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2021 | 0.17 |
Over the past year, SCHQ and SCHY have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.
SCHQ vs. SCHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHQ
SCHY
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SCHQ
SCHY
Communication Services
SCHQ
SCHY
Financial Services
SCHQ
SCHY
Basic Materials
SCHQ
-
SCHY
Consumer Cyclical
SCHQ
-
SCHY
Consumer Defensive
SCHQ
-
SCHY
Energy
SCHQ
-
SCHY
Healthcare
SCHQ
-
SCHY
Industrials
SCHQ
-
SCHY
Real Estate
SCHQ
-
SCHY
Utilities
SCHQ
-
SCHY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHQ vs. SCHY — Risk / Return Rank
SCHQ
SCHY
SCHQ vs. SCHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHQ | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.34 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 2.47 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 7.90 | -5.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHQ | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 1.89 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | 0.60 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.66 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
SCHQ vs. SCHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHQ drawdown since its inception was -46.13%, which is greater than SCHY's maximum drawdown of -24.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHQ and SCHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHQ | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.13% | -24.04% | -22.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -9.11% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.65% | -12.16% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.93% | -24.04% | -16.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.82% | -5.13% | -31.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.36% | -4.97% | -21.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 2.84% | -0.14% |
Volatility
SCHQ vs. SCHY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) is 2.57%, while Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that SCHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHQ | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 3.41% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.94% | 9.79% | -3.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.93% | 11.90% | -2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 13.25% | +1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 13.23% | +2.10% |
SCHQ vs. SCHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHQ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHY's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHQ vs. SCHY - Dividend Comparison
SCHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than SCHY's 3.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.79% | 4.54% | 4.58% | 3.79% | 2.88% | 1.69% | 1.51% | 0.44% |
SCHY Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | 3.44% | 3.55% | 4.64% | 3.97% | 3.67% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHQ and SCHY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHY has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to SCHQ (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHQ dropped -46.13% vs SCHY's -24.04%.
On 5-year performance, SCHY leads with 7.96% vs -5.29% for SCHQ. On fees, SCHQ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHY has performed better with a 7.96% return vs -5.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHQ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for SCHY.
SCHQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 3.44% for SCHY.
SCHQ is categorized as Government Bonds, while SCHY is Dividend. SCHQ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index, while SCHY tracks Dow Jones International Dividend 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHQ and 0.08% for SCHY.
SCHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHQ and SCHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer