SCHQ vs. SCHA
SCHQ (Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHQ is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index, while SCHA is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHQ returned -5.29%/yr vs 7.13%/yr for SCHA. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. SCHQ charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
SCHQ vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHQ achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 19.79% return.
SCHQ
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -1.74%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- -0.72%
- 5Y*
- -5.29%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHA
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
SCHQ vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -0.43% | 5.50% | -6.44% | 3.43% | -29.44% | -4.86% | 17.73% | -4.02% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 19.79% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 11.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHQ and SCHA is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019 | -0.03 |
The correlation between SCHQ and SCHA shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHQ vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHQ
SCHA
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SCHQ
SCHA
Communication Services
SCHQ
SCHA
Financial Services
SCHQ
SCHA
Basic Materials
SCHQ
-
SCHA
Consumer Cyclical
SCHQ
-
SCHA
Consumer Defensive
SCHQ
-
SCHA
Energy
SCHQ
-
SCHA
Healthcare
SCHQ
-
SCHA
Industrials
SCHQ
-
SCHA
Real Estate
SCHQ
-
SCHA
Utilities
SCHQ
-
SCHA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHQ vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
SCHQ
SCHA
SCHQ vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHQ | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.38 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 4.26 | -3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 15.66 | -13.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHQ | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 2.25 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | 0.33 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.57 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
SCHQ vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHQ drawdown since its inception was -46.13%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHQ and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHQ | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.13% | -42.41% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -9.50% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.65% | -27.29% | +9.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.93% | -30.79% | -10.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.82% | -0.58% | -36.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.36% | -7.58% | -18.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 2.58% | +0.12% |
Volatility
SCHQ vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) is 2.57%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that SCHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHQ | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 5.08% | -2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.94% | 12.83% | -6.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.93% | 18.01% | -9.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 21.93% | -7.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 22.71% | -7.38% |
SCHQ vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHQ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHQ vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
SCHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than SCHA's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.79% | 4.54% | 4.58% | 3.79% | 2.88% | 1.69% | 1.51% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHQ and SCHA have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHA has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to SCHQ (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHQ dropped -46.13% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
On 5-year performance, SCHA leads with 7.13% vs -5.29% for SCHQ. On fees, SCHQ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 7.13% return vs -5.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHQ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHA.
SCHQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 1.00% for SCHA.
SCHQ is categorized as Government Bonds, while SCHA is Small Cap Growth Equities. SCHQ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHQ and 0.04% for SCHA.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHQ and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer