SCHP vs. SPYM
SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHP returned 2.53%/yr vs 15.40%/yr for SPYM. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. SCHP charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
SCHP vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHP achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHP has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 2.53%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.40% annualized return.
SCHP
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
SPYM
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 24.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.40%
SCHP vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 0.96% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 8.75% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHP and SPYM is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010 | -0.05 |
The correlation between SCHP and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHP vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHP
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHP
SPYM
Financial Services
SCHP
SPYM
Basic Materials
SCHP
-
SPYM
Communication Services
SCHP
-
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
SCHP
-
SPYM
Energy
SCHP
-
SPYM
Healthcare
SCHP
-
SPYM
Industrials
SCHP
-
SPYM
Real Estate
SCHP
-
SPYM
Technology
SCHP
-
SPYM
Utilities
SCHP
-
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHP vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
SCHP
SPYM
SCHP vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHP | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.38 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 2.81 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.59 | 12.97 | -5.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHP | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 2.08 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.81 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.86 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.61 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
SCHP vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHP drawdown since its inception was -14.26%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHP and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHP | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.26% | -54.46% | +40.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.93% | -8.90% | +6.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.48% | -18.72% | +14.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.26% | -24.48% | +10.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.26% | -33.87% | +19.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -2.66% | +1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -7.15% | +3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 1.92% | -1.29% |
Volatility
SCHP vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) is 1.00%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that SCHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHP | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 3.72% | -2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.24% | 9.30% | -7.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29% | 12.07% | -8.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 16.84% | -10.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 18.02% | -12.43% |
SCHP vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHP has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHP vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
SCHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than SPYM's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 4.01% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHP and SPYM have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYM has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to SCHP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHP dropped -14.26% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.40% vs 2.53% for SCHP. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.40% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for SCHP.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 1.02% for SPYM.
SCHP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while SPYM is S&P 500. SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHP and 0.02% for SPYM.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHP and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer