SCHP vs. PXH
SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) and PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while PXH is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHP returned 2.53%/yr vs 10.44%/yr for PXH. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. SCHP charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PXH.
Performance
SCHP vs. PXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHP achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than PXH's 10.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHP has underperformed PXH with an annualized return of 2.53%, while PXH has yielded a comparatively higher 10.44% annualized return.
SCHP
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
PXH
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -3.27%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 29.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
SCHP vs. PXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 0.96% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 10.39% | 31.44% | 12.09% | 13.93% | -15.18% | 8.31% | -1.91% | 16.77% | -8.68% | 26.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHP and PXH is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2010 | -0.02 |
The correlation between SCHP and PXH shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHP vs. PXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHP
PXH
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHP
PXH
Financial Services
SCHP
PXH
Basic Materials
SCHP
-
PXH
Communication Services
SCHP
-
PXH
Consumer Defensive
SCHP
-
PXH
Energy
SCHP
-
PXH
Healthcare
SCHP
-
PXH
Industrials
SCHP
-
PXH
Real Estate
SCHP
-
PXH
Technology
SCHP
-
PXH
Utilities
SCHP
-
PXH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHP vs. PXH — Risk / Return Rank
SCHP
PXH
SCHP vs. PXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHP | PXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.35 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 2.88 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.59 | 10.56 | -2.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHP | PXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.88 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.47 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.52 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.13 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
SCHP vs. PXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHP drawdown since its inception was -14.26%, smaller than the maximum PXH drawdown of -63.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHP and PXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHP | PXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.26% | -63.63% | +49.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.93% | -10.24% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.48% | -17.72% | +13.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.26% | -29.59% | +15.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.26% | -40.42% | +26.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -5.27% | +4.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -16.86% | +12.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 2.79% | -2.16% |
Volatility
SCHP vs. PXH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) is 1.00%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that SCHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHP | PXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 6.06% | -5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.24% | 12.87% | -10.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29% | 15.75% | -12.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 17.84% | -11.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 20.08% | -14.49% |
SCHP vs. PXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHP has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PXH's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHP vs. PXH - Dividend Comparison
SCHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than PXH's 3.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.57% | 4.02% | 4.43% | 4.84% | 5.33% | 4.69% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 3.30% | 2.74% | 1.97% | 3.44% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 4.01% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHP and PXH have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXH has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to SCHP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHP dropped -14.26% vs PXH's -63.63%.
On 10-year performance, PXH leads with 10.44% vs 2.53% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PXH has performed better with a 10.44% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PXH.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 3.57% for PXH.
SCHP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while PXH is Emerging Markets Equities. SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHP and 0.50% for PXH.
PXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHP and PXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer