SCHP vs. GXC
SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) and GXC (SPDR S&P China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while GXC is a China Equities fund tracking the S&P China BMI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHP returned 2.47%/yr vs 4.30%/yr for GXC. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. SCHP charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for GXC.
Performance
SCHP vs. GXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHP achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly higher than GXC's -7.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHP has underperformed GXC with an annualized return of 2.47%, while GXC has yielded a comparatively higher 4.30% annualized return.
SCHP
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 3.05%
- 3Y*
- 3.68%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.76%
GXC
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- 6M
- -11.66%
- YTD
- -7.16%
- 1Y
- -0.19%
- 3Y*
- 9.25%
- 5Y*
- -4.10%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.81%
SCHP vs. GXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 1.00% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF | -7.16% | 30.84% | 14.60% | -9.93% | -22.12% | -19.70% | 28.31% | 23.07% | -19.39% | 51.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHP and GXC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010 | -0.06 |
The correlation between SCHP and GXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHP vs. GXC — Risk / Return Rank
SCHP
GXC
SCHP vs. GXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHP | GXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.01 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | -0.01 | +1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.53 | -0.02 | +4.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHP vs. GXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHP drawdown since its inception was -14.26%, smaller than the maximum GXC drawdown of -71.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHP and GXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHP | GXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.26% | -71.96% | +57.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.93% | -17.77% | +15.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.48% | -25.54% | +21.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.26% | -50.93% | +36.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.26% | -60.23% | +45.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -34.39% | +33.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -28.85% | +24.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 8.08% | -7.41% |
Volatility
SCHP vs. GXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) is 0.98%, while SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that SCHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHP | GXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 5.87% | -4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.45% | 14.02% | -11.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36% | 19.44% | -16.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.11% | 29.00% | -22.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 26.06% | -20.47% |
SCHP vs. GXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHP has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GXC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHP vs. GXC - Dividend Comparison
SCHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than GXC's 2.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF | 2.23% | 2.40% | 2.81% | 3.70% | 2.67% | 1.35% | 1.04% | 1.60% | 2.03% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 2.85% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 4.49% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHP and GXC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXC has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to SCHP (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHP dropped -14.26% vs GXC's -71.96%.
On 10-year performance, GXC leads with 4.30% vs 2.47% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GXC has performed better with a 4.30% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GXC.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 2.23% for GXC.
SCHP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while GXC is China Equities. SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while GXC tracks S&P China BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHP and 0.59% for GXC.
SCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHP and GXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer