PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHM vs. WMGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHM vs. WMGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund (WMGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHM achieves a 22.04% return, which is significantly higher than WMGAX's 2.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHM having a 12.31% annualized return and WMGAX not far behind at 11.73%.


SCHM

1D
1.96%
1M
4.00%
YTD
22.04%
6M
19.62%
1Y
34.41%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
12.31%

WMGAX

1D
0.77%
1M
0.82%
YTD
2.50%
6M
0.13%
1Y
3.76%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
-0.18%
10Y*
11.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHM vs. WMGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
22.04%10.17%11.98%16.69%-17.07%19.36%15.26%27.48%-8.77%19.60%
WMGAX
Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund
2.50%0.83%10.02%19.97%-30.68%16.22%48.56%38.01%-0.20%26.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHM and WMGAX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011

0.90

The correlation between SCHM and WMGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHM vs. WMGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHM
SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

WMGAX
WMGAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
WMGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
WMGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHM vs. WMGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund (WMGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHMWMGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.04

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

0.19

+3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.81

0.52

+14.29

SCHM vs. WMGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHM Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the WMGAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHM and WMGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHM vs. WMGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, smaller than the maximum WMGAX drawdown of -53.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and WMGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHMWMGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.43%

-53.74%

+11.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-16.16%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-26.59%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.46%

-42.95%

+16.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.43%

-42.95%

+0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-15.03%

+15.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-13.62%

+7.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

5.95%

-3.62%

Volatility

SCHM vs. WMGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) is 5.91%, while Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund (WMGAX) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that SCHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHMWMGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.91%

6.39%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.69%

13.99%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

17.96%

-1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.68%

25.16%

-5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.49%

23.19%

-2.70%

SCHM vs. WMGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than WMGAX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHM vs. WMGAX - Dividend Comparison

SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than WMGAX's 10.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
1.21%1.46%1.43%1.50%1.67%1.13%1.31%1.48%1.56%1.27%1.51%1.54%
WMGAX
Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund
10.83%11.10%15.30%6.66%11.94%13.08%9.97%5.23%10.28%7.92%3.98%10.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHM and WMGAX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMGAX has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to SCHM (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHM dropped -42.43% vs WMGAX's -53.74%.

SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHM and WMGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer