SCHM vs. USCF
SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) and USCF (Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while USCF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SCHM returned 32.45% vs 16.50% for USCF. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHM charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for USCF.
Performance
SCHM vs. USCF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHM achieves a 19.05% return, which is significantly higher than USCF's 3.99% return.
SCHM
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 19.05%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- 1Y
- 32.45%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
USCF
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- 1Y
- 16.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHM vs. USCF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 19.05% | 10.17% | 11.98% | 2.85% |
USCF Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF | 3.99% | 15.71% | 17.65% | 2.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHM and USCF is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023 | 0.72 |
The correlation between SCHM and USCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHM vs. USCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHM
USCF
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Technology
SCHM
USCF
Industrials
SCHM
USCF
Financial Services
SCHM
USCF
Healthcare
SCHM
USCF
Consumer Cyclical
SCHM
USCF
Real Estate
SCHM
USCF
Basic Materials
SCHM
USCF
Consumer Defensive
SCHM
USCF
Energy
SCHM
USCF
Utilities
SCHM
USCF
-
Communication Services
SCHM
USCF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHM vs. USCF — Risk / Return Rank
SCHM
USCF
SCHM vs. USCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (USCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHM | USCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.24 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 2.88 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.11 | 8.69 | +5.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHM | USCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 1.29 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 1.07 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
SCHM vs. USCF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, which is greater than USCF's maximum drawdown of -16.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and USCF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHM | USCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.43% | -16.67% | -25.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -5.75% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -0.75% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.66% | -2.23% | -3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 1.90% | +0.41% |
Volatility
SCHM vs. USCF - Volatility Comparison
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (USCF) at 2.52%. This indicates that SCHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHM | USCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 2.52% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | 10.07% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 12.82% | +2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 15.16% | +4.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.46% | 15.16% | +5.30% |
SCHM vs. USCF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than USCF's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHM vs. USCF - Dividend Comparison
SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than USCF's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.22% | 1.46% | 1.43% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 1.54% |
USCF Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF | 1.77% | 1.84% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHM and USCF have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHM has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to USCF (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHM dropped -42.43% vs USCF's -16.67%.
On 1-year performance, SCHM leads with 32.45% vs 16.50% for USCF. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, USCF has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHM has performed better with a 32.45% return vs 16.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for USCF.
USCF has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.22% for SCHM.
SCHM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while USCF is Large Cap Value Equities. SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while USCF tracks Solactive US Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHM and 0.29% for USCF.
SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHM and USCF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer