PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHM vs. PFSLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHM vs. PFSLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHM achieves a 19.05% return, which is significantly lower than PFSLX's 42.35% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHM has underperformed PFSLX with an annualized return of 11.37%, while PFSLX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.05% annualized return.


SCHM

1D
-0.03%
1M
5.28%
YTD
19.05%
6M
19.54%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
11.37%

PFSLX

1D
5.06%
1M
8.76%
YTD
42.35%
6M
41.43%
1Y
81.72%
3Y*
28.87%
5Y*
14.84%
10Y*
17.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHM vs. PFSLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
19.05%10.17%11.98%16.69%-17.07%19.36%15.26%27.48%-8.77%19.60%
PFSLX
Paradigm Select Fund
42.35%13.27%16.73%26.94%-26.44%31.16%26.05%38.32%-9.93%16.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHM and PFSLX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2011

0.91

The correlation between SCHM and PFSLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHM vs. PFSLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHM
SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

PFSLX
PFSLX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PFSLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHM vs. PFSLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHMPFSLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.54

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

7.85

-4.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.11

30.84

-16.73

SCHM vs. PFSLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHM Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the PFSLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHM and PFSLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHMPFSLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

3.46

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.10

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.16

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.17

+0.42

Drawdowns

SCHM vs. PFSLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, smaller than the maximum PFSLX drawdown of -91.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and PFSLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHMPFSLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.43%

-91.83%

+49.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-10.91%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-91.83%

+68.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.46%

-91.83%

+65.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.43%

-91.83%

+49.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-82.77%

+82.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-13.72%

+8.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

2.77%

-0.46%

Volatility

SCHM vs. PFSLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) is 4.72%, while Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX) has a volatility of 8.44%. This indicates that SCHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFSLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHMPFSLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

8.44%

-3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

19.31%

-7.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

24.76%

-9.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

145.95%

-126.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.46%

104.42%

-83.96%

SCHM vs. PFSLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PFSLX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHM vs. PFSLX - Dividend Comparison

SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than PFSLX's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFSLX
Paradigm Select Fund
0.10%0.14%0.02%0.31%0.01%0.17%0.11%0.58%2.93%3.89%0.74%9.40%
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
1.22%1.46%1.43%1.50%1.67%1.13%1.31%1.48%1.56%1.27%1.51%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHM and PFSLX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFSLX has higher volatility (8.44%) compared to SCHM (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHM dropped -42.43% vs PFSLX's -91.83%.

PFSLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHM and PFSLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer