SCHM vs. FEMG
SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) and FEMG (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. SCHM is passively managed, while FEMG is actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHM charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for FEMG.
Performance
SCHM vs. FEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCHM
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 19.05%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- 1Y
- 32.45%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
FEMG
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHM vs. FEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 5.18% |
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 5.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHM and FEMG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026 | 0.66 |
SCHM vs. FEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHM
FEMG
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
SCHM
FEMG
Industrials
SCHM
FEMG
Financial Services
SCHM
FEMG
Healthcare
SCHM
FEMG
Consumer Cyclical
SCHM
FEMG
Real Estate
SCHM
FEMG
Basic Materials
SCHM
FEMG
Consumer Defensive
SCHM
FEMG
Energy
SCHM
FEMG
Utilities
SCHM
FEMG
Communication Services
SCHM
FEMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHM vs. FEMG — Risk / Return Rank
SCHM
FEMG
SCHM vs. FEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHM | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.09 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.94 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.11 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHM | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 6.56 | -5.97 |
Drawdowns
SCHM vs. FEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, which is greater than FEMG's maximum drawdown of -3.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and FEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHM | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.43% | -3.29% | -39.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -0.34% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.66% | -0.95% | -4.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | — | — |
Volatility
SCHM vs. FEMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHM | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 12.04% | +3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 12.04% | +7.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.46% | 12.04% | +8.42% |
SCHM vs. FEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMG's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHM vs. FEMG - Dividend Comparison
SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, while FEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.22% | 1.46% | 1.43% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHM and FEMG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for FEMG.
SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.00% for FEMG.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHM and 0.23% for FEMG.
Find the right allocation for SCHM and FEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer