PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHM vs. FEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHM vs. FEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SCHM

1D
-0.03%
1M
5.28%
YTD
19.05%
6M
19.54%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
11.37%

FEMG

1D
-0.34%
1M
4.84%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHM vs. FEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCHM and FEMG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026

0.66

SCHM vs. FEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHM
FEMG

Technology

22.0%
24.0%

Industrials

21.4%
26.5%

Financial Services

11.3%
6.0%

Healthcare

10.8%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
17.4%

Real Estate

6.5%
1.8%

Basic Materials

4.7%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
1.4%

Energy

3.6%
3.3%

Utilities

3.0%
2.9%

Communication Services

2.6%
2.7%

Technology

SCHM
22.0%
FEMG
24.0%

Industrials

SCHM
21.4%
FEMG
26.5%

Financial Services

SCHM
11.3%
FEMG
6.0%

Healthcare

SCHM
10.8%
FEMG
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHM
10.3%
FEMG
17.4%

Real Estate

SCHM
6.5%
FEMG
1.8%

Basic Materials

SCHM
4.7%
FEMG
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

SCHM
3.8%
FEMG
1.4%

Energy

SCHM
3.6%
FEMG
3.3%

Utilities

SCHM
3.0%
FEMG
2.9%

Communication Services

SCHM
2.6%
FEMG
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHM vs. FEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHM
SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FEMG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHM vs. FEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHMFEMGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.11

SCHM vs. FEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHMFEMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

6.56

-5.97

Drawdowns

SCHM vs. FEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, which is greater than FEMG's maximum drawdown of -3.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and FEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHMFEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.43%

-3.29%

-39.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.34%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-0.95%

-4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

Volatility

SCHM vs. FEMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHMFEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

12.04%

+3.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

12.04%

+7.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.46%

12.04%

+8.42%

SCHM vs. FEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMG's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHM vs. FEMG - Dividend Comparison

SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, while FEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEMG
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
1.22%1.46%1.43%1.50%1.67%1.13%1.31%1.48%1.56%1.27%1.51%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHM and FEMG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for FEMG.

SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.00% for FEMG.

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHM and 0.23% for FEMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHM and FEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer