PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHLX vs. MGHYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHLX vs. MGHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Health and Wellness Fund (SCHLX) and DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHLX achieves a -4.95% return, which is significantly lower than MGHYX's 1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHLX has outperformed MGHYX with an annualized return of 7.47%, while MGHYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.93% annualized return.


SCHLX

1D
3.12%
1M
3.30%
YTD
-4.95%
6M
-4.34%
1Y
10.41%
3Y*
5.55%
5Y*
4.27%
10Y*
7.47%

MGHYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.43%
6M
2.26%
1Y
7.41%
3Y*
8.19%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
4.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHLX vs. MGHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHLX
DWS Health and Wellness Fund
-4.95%12.67%3.62%5.56%-7.22%15.43%15.40%22.40%3.50%19.37%
MGHYX
DWS Global High Income Fund
1.43%9.82%6.99%11.17%-11.67%3.22%6.83%16.36%-1.85%6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHLX and MGHYX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHLX vs. MGHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHLX
SCHLX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SCHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

MGHYX
MGHYX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MGHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MGHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHLX vs. MGHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Health and Wellness Fund (SCHLX) and DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHLXMGHYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.56

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

2.78

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.91

11.89

-9.98

SCHLX vs. MGHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the MGHYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHLX and MGHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHLXMGHYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

2.39

-1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.70

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.84

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.03

+0.47

Drawdowns

SCHLX vs. MGHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHLX drawdown since its inception was -45.46%, smaller than the maximum MGHYX drawdown of -53.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHLX and MGHYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHLXMGHYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.46%

-53.47%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.08%

-2.69%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.73%

-4.33%

-13.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.62%

-15.93%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.47%

-21.84%

-5.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

-0.32%

-7.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.17%

-24.12%

+14.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

0.63%

+4.85%

Volatility

SCHLX vs. MGHYX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Health and Wellness Fund (SCHLX) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) at 0.90%. This indicates that SCHLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHLXMGHYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

0.90%

+4.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

2.30%

+8.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.94%

3.12%

+11.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

5.08%

+9.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.70%

5.89%

+10.81%

SCHLX vs. MGHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHLX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than MGHYX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHLX vs. MGHYX - Dividend Comparison

SCHLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, less than MGHYX's 5.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGHYX
DWS Global High Income Fund
5.69%7.17%5.58%4.35%5.81%4.20%5.81%5.63%6.96%3.76%0.00%0.00%
SCHLX
DWS Health and Wellness Fund
5.48%5.21%1.19%5.29%1.77%9.02%9.13%9.88%11.48%6.52%2.84%16.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHLX and MGHYX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHLX has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to MGHYX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHLX dropped -45.46% vs MGHYX's -53.47%.

MGHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHLX and MGHYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer