SCHLX vs. FIKCX
SCHLX (DWS Health and Wellness Fund) and FIKCX (Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SCHLX returned 3.42%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FIKCX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHLX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FIKCX.
Performance
SCHLX vs. FIKCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHLX achieves a -6.63% return, which is significantly lower than FIKCX's 0.08% return.
SCHLX
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- -6.63%
- 6M
- -7.02%
- 1Y
- 9.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.45%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.73%
FIKCX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- -1.67%
- 1Y
- 21.51%
- 3Y*
- 2.99%
- 5Y*
- 0.48%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHLX vs. FIKCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHLX DWS Health and Wellness Fund | -6.63% | 12.67% | 3.62% | 5.56% | -7.22% | 15.43% | 15.40% | 22.40% | -8.63% |
FIKCX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z | 0.08% | 14.61% | -5.73% | 4.20% | -12.74% | 11.66% | 21.55% | 28.39% | -11.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHLX and FIKCX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SCHLX and FIKCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHLX vs. FIKCX — Risk / Return Rank
SCHLX
FIKCX
SCHLX vs. FIKCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Health and Wellness Fund (SCHLX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z (FIKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHLX | FIKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.23 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 1.60 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.49 | 4.24 | -2.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHLX vs. FIKCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHLX drawdown since its inception was -45.46%, which is greater than FIKCX's maximum drawdown of -29.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHLX and FIKCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHLX | FIKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.46% | -29.19% | -16.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.08% | -13.35% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.73% | -25.31% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.62% | -29.19% | +10.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.83% | -6.06% | -3.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -9.26% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.70% | 5.04% | +0.66% |
Volatility
SCHLX vs. FIKCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DWS Health and Wellness Fund (SCHLX) is 5.14%, while Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z (FIKCX) has a volatility of 6.00%. This indicates that SCHLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIKCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHLX | FIKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 6.00% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.63% | 12.64% | -2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.97% | 16.38% | -1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 18.46% | -3.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 20.29% | -3.58% |
SCHLX vs. FIKCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHLX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKCX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHLX vs. FIKCX - Dividend Comparison
SCHLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, less than FIKCX's 11.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKCX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z | 11.47% | 11.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.71% | 5.86% | 0.61% | 4.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHLX DWS Health and Wellness Fund | 5.58% | 5.21% | 1.19% | 5.29% | 1.77% | 9.02% | 9.13% | 9.88% | 11.48% | 6.52% | 2.84% | 16.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHLX and FIKCX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIKCX has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to SCHLX (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHLX dropped -45.46% vs FIKCX's -29.19%.
FIKCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHLX and FIKCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer