SCHK vs. UGA
SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund, LP) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHK is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Schwab 1000 Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Near-Month NYMEX RBOB Gasoline Futures Contract. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHK returned 12.33%/yr vs 25.31%/yr for UGA. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SCHK charges 0.03%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for UGA.
Performance
SCHK vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHK achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 80.98% return.
SCHK
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- 20.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.61%
UGA
- 1D
- -5.27%
- 1M
- 8.52%
- 6M
- 69.92%
- YTD
- 80.98%
- 1Y
- 78.20%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- 25.31%
- 10Y*
- 16.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $27.70M | $27.97M | $27.91M | |
| $8.16M | $5.91M | $4.98M |
SCHK vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 11.92% | 17.23% | 24.48% | 26.63% | -19.51% | 26.17% | 20.75% | 31.31% | -5.09% | 5.24% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund, LP | 80.98% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 12.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHK and UGA is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017 | 0.18 |
The correlation between SCHK and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHK vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
SCHK
UGA
SCHK vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHK | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.35 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 3.87 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.09 | 10.83 | +0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHK vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHK drawdown since its inception was -34.80%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHK and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHK | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.80% | -86.59% | +51.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.97% | -20.32% | +11.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | -26.68% | +7.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -38.11% | +12.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.61% | +10.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.11% | -36.53% | +31.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 7.25% | -5.16% |
Volatility
SCHK vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) is 3.78%, while United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA) has a volatility of 12.68%. This indicates that SCHK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHK | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 12.68% | -8.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.36% | 32.51% | -22.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 36.42% | -23.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 34.68% | -17.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 37.30% | -18.25% |
SCHK vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHK has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHK vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
SCHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.02% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund, LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHK and UGA have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to SCHK (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHK dropped -34.80% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 25.31% vs 12.33% for SCHK. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHK has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 25.31% return vs 12.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for UGA.
SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
SCHK is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index, while UGA tracks Near-Month NYMEX RBOB Gasoline Futures Contract. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHK and 1.02% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHK and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer