SCHK vs. QQQ
SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHK is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Schwab 1000 Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHK returned 12.15%/yr vs 15.94%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHK charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
SCHK vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHK achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 15.95% return.
SCHK
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 6.80%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 20.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 15.95%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- 25.87%
- 5Y*
- 15.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.01%
SCHK vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 8.17% | 17.23% | 24.48% | 26.63% | -19.51% | 26.17% | 20.75% | 31.31% | -5.09% | 5.24% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 15.95% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 5.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHK and QQQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SCHK and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHK vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHK
QQQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SCHK
QQQ
Financial Services
SCHK
QQQ
Communication Services
SCHK
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
SCHK
QQQ
Industrials
SCHK
QQQ
Healthcare
SCHK
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
SCHK
QQQ
Energy
SCHK
QQQ
Utilities
SCHK
QQQ
Real Estate
SCHK
QQQ
Basic Materials
SCHK
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHK vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SCHK
QQQ
SCHK vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHK | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.32 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 2.71 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.86 | 10.01 | +0.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHK vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHK drawdown since its inception was -34.80%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHK and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHK | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.80% | -82.97% | +48.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.97% | -11.96% | +2.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | -22.77% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -35.12% | +9.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.31% | -4.66% | +1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -32.72% | +27.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 3.23% | -1.21% |
Volatility
SCHK vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) is 4.95%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that SCHK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHK | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 9.17% | -4.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 14.54% | -4.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.82% | 17.95% | -5.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 22.69% | -5.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 22.41% | -3.29% |
SCHK vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHK has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHK vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
SCHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SCHK and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to SCHK (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHK dropped -34.80% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 15.94% vs 12.15% for SCHK. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHK has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 15.94% return vs 12.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.43% for QQQ.
SCHK is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHK and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHK and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer