PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHK vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHK vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHK achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.46% return.


SCHK

1D
-0.34%
1M
-1.28%
YTD
8.17%
6M
6.80%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
20.60%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*

MTUM

1D
-0.41%
1M
8.29%
YTD
31.46%
6M
28.81%
1Y
39.62%
3Y*
33.68%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
17.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHK vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHK
Schwab 1000 Index ETF
8.17%17.23%24.48%26.63%-19.51%26.17%20.75%31.31%-5.09%5.24%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
31.46%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHK and MTUM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017

0.86

The correlation between SCHK and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHK vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHK
MTUM

Technology

38.0%
50.2%

Financial Services

11.2%
5.0%

Communication Services

10.1%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
2.9%

Industrials

8.9%
15.0%

Healthcare

8.4%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
3.7%

Energy

3.2%
10.5%

Utilities

2.1%
0.6%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.3%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.3%

Technology

SCHK
38.0%
MTUM
50.2%

Financial Services

SCHK
11.2%
MTUM
5.0%

Communication Services

SCHK
10.1%
MTUM
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHK
9.8%
MTUM
2.9%

Industrials

SCHK
8.9%
MTUM
15.0%

Healthcare

SCHK
8.4%
MTUM
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

SCHK
4.3%
MTUM
3.7%

Energy

SCHK
3.2%
MTUM
10.5%

Utilities

SCHK
2.1%
MTUM
0.6%

Real Estate

SCHK
2.0%
MTUM
1.3%

Basic Materials

SCHK
1.9%
MTUM
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHK vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHK
SCHK Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SCHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHK Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHK Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHK vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHKMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.33

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

3.45

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.86

13.13

-2.27

SCHK vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHK Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHK and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHK vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHK drawdown since its inception was -34.80%, roughly equal to the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHK and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHKMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.80%

-34.08%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-11.54%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-20.99%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-32.28%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-4.87%

+1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-6.19%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

3.03%

-1.01%

Volatility

SCHK vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) is 4.95%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 12.23%. This indicates that SCHK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHKMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

12.23%

-7.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.07%

19.36%

-9.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.82%

21.89%

-9.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

21.15%

-3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

21.31%

-2.19%

SCHK vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHK has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHK vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

SCHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than MTUM's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.56%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
SCHK
Schwab 1000 Index ETF
1.03%1.09%1.20%1.38%1.57%1.17%1.58%1.82%1.80%0.31%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHK and MTUM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (12.23%) compared to SCHK (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHK dropped -34.80% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 5-year performance, MTUM leads with 15.03% vs 12.15% for SCHK. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHK has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 15.03% return vs 12.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.

SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.56% for MTUM.

SCHK is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHK and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHK and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer