SCHJ vs. QCON
SCHJ (Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. SCHJ is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. SCHJ charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
SCHJ vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCHJ
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.31%
- 10Y*
- —
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHJ vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 0.07% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
SCHJ vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHJ
QCON
Financial Services
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
SCHJ
QCON
Technology
SCHJ
QCON
-
Healthcare
SCHJ
QCON
-
Industrials
SCHJ
QCON
Consumer Cyclical
SCHJ
QCON
-
Utilities
SCHJ
QCON
Consumer Defensive
SCHJ
QCON
-
Communication Services
SCHJ
QCON
-
Real Estate
SCHJ
QCON
-
Energy
SCHJ
QCON
-
Basic Materials
SCHJ
QCON
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHJ vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank
SCHJ
QCON
SCHJ vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHJ | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.17 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHJ | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SCHJ vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHJ drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHJ and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHJ | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | 0.00% | -13.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | 0.00% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | 0.00% | -1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | — | — |
Volatility
SCHJ vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHJ | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87% | 0.00% | +1.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 0.00% | +2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.13% | 0.00% | +4.13% |
SCHJ vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHJ has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHJ vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
SCHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.50% | 4.42% | 4.00% | 2.98% | 1.64% | 0.94% | 2.54% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SCHJ is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHJ is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.
SCHJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHJ and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for SCHJ and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer